ADVANCED UFO RESEARCH
(Work in Progress)* Please go to the Sedona Chapter for updates*
This is a scientific study. There is no religious value associated to this work. It is based on
physical evidence (HD photography). US Military photographic training/ my Father was PMEL
Supportive discussions by Dr. Edgar Mitchell (Apollo 14)
Thank you, again; WUSA 9 News (CBS News, Washington)
Timeline generally starts at the top of each chapter. As the sample progresses downwards,
we reach the beginning chapters, and my 35 mm film UFO research 2002-2008. However; all
samples on the study, are Nikon HD 35 mm full frame digital, starting with Nikon D700, July 28, 2008
China/India UFO Match* based on comparative analysis. Click on image to enter
UFO Denver 11-08-2012. This Denver report is a match to what I have been reporting for the past 2 years, in DC.
Please go to the POLITICO chapter for this extraordinary update.
UFOdc.com is a Professional Research and Production organization.
I use advanced imaging technology developed by Nikon. To my associates, however; I defer queries regarding other technology*
For that, I use Dr. Bruce Maccabee, whom in part, is responsible for the work presented in this research sample. Scientific Pro's!
Our other associates include esteemed Astronauts, NASA Scientist, Dr. Edgar Mitchell and others.
Using Nikon advanced terrestrial (D4) NASA grade*
scan technology to analyze the skies, I am able to see what the human eye does not. Capturing a fraction of a second sequentially,
in a series of frames, using high definition optical technology. I forensically show the validity of each documented sample. Windows 7
64 Bit supporting software/AVID/Adobe/Autodesk/Sony.
UFOdc.com YouTube channel, has video analysis and supportive data relative to each sample, if applicable.
If there are UFO's, I will find them. We will come to You. Let us capture your UFOs! Based on funding*
Contact us: UFOdc@aol.com
*NASA uses D3S Nikon onboard the Space Station.
Thank You Nikon NPS
Sedona 4-05-2013 Findings will appear in
the Sedona chapter below. What I imaged can only be described as Extraordinary!
We Are Not Alone!
5-17-2013 Cylinder anomalies (UFOs), are imaged nightly from my cameras POV. This is cylinder 1 of 2 imaged on
Enhanced sample showing anomaly and its energy contrail. In each sample, with this anomaly (UFO), there is a
contrail associated to it. In most cases, this is a singular frame sample, with a singular reference of this UFO in
each example. However; this morning, again, I captured 2 references of this object or kind of object, in my shoot.
Cylinder 2, imaged 1 hour later that the first object, on 5-17-2013, POV Washington DC
Enhanced sample of cylinder 2 imaged 5-17-2013
Wilbur Allen on the Roxy Lopez Show
Cylinder UFO# 1 of 2, 5-13-2013. Luminous object with energy contrail, and usually in a single frame, taken in a
sequence. However; this morning, this is number 1 of 2 that appeared in the video stream.
Enhanced scan of Cylinder # 1, 5-13-2013 and its energy contrail. Whatever this object is, its moving at an accelerated
rate. The second cylinder is farther off in space, or significantly smaller?
Cylinder 2, 5-13-2013 is imaged in the same angular position as the cylinder above (Cylinder 1)
Enhanced scan of Cylinder #2, 5-13-2013. Its in the same angular configuration as the first sample, imaged 2
UFO 5-01-2013 are a return of 2 spheres in formation, that I have imaged numerous times above my home. However;
this sequence of images shows these spheres suddenly appear and then vanish from the image area. Last imaged in the
same POV on 4-22-2013. Please click on the image to see the event video. I highlighted the image area of the UFOs
sudden manifestation for when viewing the original HD video file.
4-28-2013 and the detection of "Sudden Manifestation"* in DC airspace. In my field studies, I have documented
objects which "suddenly manifest" into the image area, as demonstrated in Sedona Arizona 4-07-2013. The Sedona
samples are the first to be imaged on video, however; not the first example of sudden manifestation. My first
examples of the phenomena are imaged in AREA 51 Nevada during the filming of "My Big Redneck Vacation"
(CMT/MTV). Note in imaged sample composite, the object suddenly materializes into the image frame as a
luminous object, which does not appear in any of its preceding frames. It Suddenly Manifested into the airspace*
Video 2 enhanced in AVID Media Composer 6.5 using Boris Fx BCC Time warp and NR Technology
Extraordinary UFO flyby (x 2) imaged 4-26-2013 from my camera POV location. However, this round instead of
my standard 90 degree upwards camera position, I aimed my camera towards the sky facing East, in the direction
of Baltimore-New York City, exactly due North from my general POV. The camera is aimed 60 degrees upwards and
eastwardly. For the sake of space, I have created a composite of Flyby 1 of 2. I captured the luminous UFO on 2
separate flybys. It maintained a straight flight trajectory based on flyby 1 samples*.
* 1 of 2 flyby examples.
Video of event. For YouTube video please click on images that indicate video*
Flyby 2 shows this object was in a turning flight pattern. 2nd of 2 flyby examples. Connecting the dots, we can
determine its trajectory. In this case, its turning. Video of the event (Slow motion) is linked to this sample.
Enhanced frame of UFO 4-26-2013 Washington DC Logan Circle
Enhanced frame UFO Washington DC 4-26-2013 (Enlarged)
Prior to this event, an unknown aircraft (helicopter) perhaps in silent mode, is imaged.
Russian UFO 4-25-2013. Click on image for video. The Russian UFO sample in all respects, is a match too 4-26-2013
Cylinder 4-26-2013 Enhanced
4-22-2013 Cylinder and Sphere formation return in the same flight trajectory they are always captured in.
Enhanced sample Cylinder 4-22-2013 DC. Sample is diffused by subtle overcast, however; its contrail is still apparent.
Return of the Sphere Anomalies 4-22-2013 (Comparative video)
4-02-2013 Cylinder Anomaly, imaged at 1/60th of a second at F-1.8 using 102400 ISO. 1 frame in 20000 (6 hours)
taken from POV Logan Circle, in Washington DC. Note Washington DC is photonically polluted. The excessive street
lighting cerates a light bubble in which serves as a level of diffusion and distortion. Camera sensitivity allows for the
visibility of cloud matter considered overcast.
4-02-2013 Cylinder Anomaly enhanced. This is a video stream at 102400 ISO, using Nikon D4 Video technology.
Other technologies are used in the translation of this data: AVID Media Composer 6.5 with BORIS Fx BCC technology.
The analysis of the video streams generated by my cameras and the Nikon Video, resulted in these frames of video stills
extractions. Though the camera generates HD output, there is noise in the video translation at higher ISO's, when
introduced into video editing applications, such as Avid Media Composer and its AVID Codec. Generally, HD cameras
do not utilize A/V NR (noise reduction) technology. For that I use Boris Fx BCC in the AVID stream. BCC NR is
applied to video stream samples and video stream stills.
Enhanced scan of Cylinder 4-01-2013 shows in detail, the anomalies contrail.
Cylinder Anomaly 3-27-2013, imaged at 100000 ISO @ 1/60th of a second at F-1.8. Anomaly appears in 1 frame of
20000 taken from stationary POV
Anomaly enhanced, and I am unable to determine its contrail direction? It has 2 contrails associated to it? At 1/60th
of a second, at the distance in which the anomaly appears, it should have much more definition, however; does not.
Cylinder anomaly 1, imaged 3-23-2013. I'm imaging the same kinds of anomalies, on a daily (nightly) basis. Initially
imaged and encountered 11-01-2012 in Shreveport LA.
Enhanced sample and propulsion contrail associated to UFO anomaly.
Cylinder anomaly imaged 3-23-2013, is sampled within cloud coverage. Imaged at 1/30th of a second using 85 mm
F 1.8 @ 50000 ISO. I am capturing this anomaly on a nightly basis from a fixed POV, above my home. Enhanced
sample to follow.
Enhanced sample is a match to the anomaly initially imaged in Shreveport 11-01-2012, however; this is 3-23-2013.
Note the anomaly has a propulsion signature associated to it.
3-21-2013 (early AM) Formation of anomalies imaged again, however; they are moving much faster. Composite
Imaged at 1/30th of a second, every second, at 50000 ISO. The interval function of the D4 Nikon allows for extended
periods of time. In this case, 6 hours of imagery or 20000 frames of samples imaged every second. This is a
second by second account of activity from reference POV on Logan Circle, Washington DC.
Cylinder 3-21-2013. The recurrence of this anomaly, on a nightly basis is becoming concerning.
Enhanced sample of the cylinder imaged 3-21-2013, shows this anomaly was changing directions, altering course.
3-20-2013 anomaly. Perhaps a meteor, however: undetermined. 180 mm perspective
Enhanced sample of anomaly 2-20-2013 180 mm
My Big Redneck Vacation UFOdc.com
3-19-2013 Cylinder 10 mm perspective. This super wide angle perspective should give you an indicator on the size
of this anomaly, based on the 10 mm perspective
Cylinder enhanced 3-19-2013. At 10 mm POV, this anomaly is obviously large. It is 100% consistent with the
additional samples within this analysis.
3-17-2013 Cylinder anomaly imaged at 1/60th of a second using 50 mm F 1.4 lens at F-1.4 using 50000 ISO sensitivity
Enhanced sample of luminous cylinder anomaly. Note if this were a meteor, there would be slight yet obvious
deviations in the consistency of the streak. In this case the streak is a solid linear line, indicating a solid object.
Imaged at 1/60th of a second, should be the other flag? At this shutter speed, I should see definition to a
degree, of this anomaly.
3-15-2013 Luminous Cylinder UFO imaged in a sequence of frames (20000). Generally, anomalies as such are
imaged in singular frames, I have captured this event in one occasion, in multiple frames, such as the sample
below imaged 3-13-2013* I cannot explain the fluctuations in the cylinder (zig-zagging effect) within the sample.
Odd, most of my samples are all in the same angular configuration/trajectory.
3-13-2013 and the return/exit of an anomaly imaged 2-20-2013. From 20000 frame sequence, 4 frames showing
a single anomaly manifest and then vanish into nothing. This is a first, to have this anomaly, in more than 2 instances
Frame 1 reference file. Clear starfield 3-13-2013. In discussion of ET wormhole technology, I defer to my associate
Dr. Edgar Mitchell, LEM Pilot of Apollo 14
Manifestation 1 of Orange luminous anomaly 3-13-2013. Object is consistent with earlier samples imaged at reference
Manifestation of anomaly, now in frame 2 of sequence taken. Other than color, the anomaly is consistent with samples
imaged earlier from location POV.
Manifestation 3 of single anomaly, however; now less defined structurally
Frame after manifestation 3 is completely clear. Where did the anomaly go, if not exiting through the gate in which it
entered. Click on this frame to see slow motion animation made from this frame sequence (3-13-2013)
Composite frame made of anomaly trajectory 3-13-2013. Note the consistency in luminous attributes of this sample
and the sample directly below (3-10-2013) and the formation of luminous orange spheres. Could this be such an
anomaly, however; at extreme velocity? I believe it is.
3-10-2013 (Slow motion files). The discussion of Plasma based ET Spacecraft, as discussed by Dr. Edgar Mitchell
LEM Pilot of Apollo 14.
2-27-2013 UFO Formation Flyby. Objects are flying against a crosswind, however unaffected by the crosswinds in their flight trajectory
Click on image for RAW video file. Note the direction of the clouds compared to the flight trajectory of the spheres, which based on the
cloud physical evidence, indicates these cannot be balloons. Balloons don't fly in formation nor do they fly with a crosswind, as these
objects clearly do, in the video attached to this file. The slow motion analysis is attached to the next image file. Note there are
stragglers in this formation.
2-27-2013 additional frame showing formation and objects that follow. However; they are in flight against a crosswind, making
this physically impossible to be balloons. (Slow Motion Analysis, click on above image)
(1951 UFO squadron comparative analysis/Lubbock Lights) Below
Avid MC6 and BORIS BCC technology used in video analysis*
Click on image above for 1951 comparative analysis These anomalies are not new, and have a History.
The 1951 sample has similarities that are without doubt consistent with the anomalies I imaged 2-27-2013.
Monochrome sample created and adjusted for 1951 Lubbock analysis. The 1951 footage, 100 ISO at best, based
on film history and technology used in the 1950's. The 1950 sample would have been under exposed in conventional
standards. If the luminous objects where greater in luminosity than the films ability to reproduce that light source
under those conditions. In that era, a camera flash had to be used for night time applications. Though the attempt
to recreate the 1950 footage is nobel, it is futile to attempt to degrade an HD file to simulate a sample from primitive
technology, though I'm sure in 1950 it was state of the art. Secondly, whatever these objects were, they were self
illuminated and propelled. They maintained structural integrity throughout the imaged samples. If they were birds, I
would have been able to determine that fact based on the physical samples, however; I cannot.
WUSA 9 CBS News story on the FBI document released regarding a 1950 UFO crash and its occupants.
News anchor Derek McGinty and Reporter Ko Im, on UFOdc.com's assessment of a FBI document
released on a 1950 UFO crash involving 3 flying saucers.
Wave 2 of 3 spheres flyby 2-27-2013 (1951 UFO squadron comparative analysis/Lubbock Lights)
Wave 3 of 3 and flying against the flow of the jet stream 2-27-2013. Click on image for full Slow Motion Analysis.
UFO 2-05-2013 imaged from rooftop POV on Logan Circle. I believe this anomaly to be the same object imaged in
the same area in 2008 http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/myshot/gallery/26800#/gallery/191723/ Click on image
above to access extraordinary video. Please play all UFOdc.com videos in 1080 full screen mode. Further, imaged
2-10-2013 from the same POV, this luminous anomaly. An analysis by Dr. Maccabee and a composite frame
of the object as it flies by in this sequence of frames is within the Dr. Maccabee chapter.
All physical samples that match "definition", are within chapters defined to each specific anomaly. There are
14 chapters associated to this research sample. (UFOdc)
POV 2 anomaly may or may not be the same object? However; it has the same qualities as the first sample, however
this time the object is much closer, perhaps in front of my home. In an attempt to disprove this sample, I programmed
the camera to fire images in the airspace of Reagan National Airport. I was unable to recreate the luminous white sphere,
and my samples showed clearly, aircraft navigation lighting. Navigation lighting is not apparent in these white spheres,
which may be this anomaly (7-20-2010: Dr. Bruce Maccabee analysis)
UFO Logan Circle 2-02-2013. Video Indicates that this recurring anomaly has interest in this area? This is the second
filmed documentation, from the exact same POV as an event imaged 5-06-2012. Click on image to enter chapter with
I cannot believe what I'm imaging over my home for the past week! Alien Wormhole technology and Cylinder
spacecraft Here are 4 frames taken 2-20-2013 in sequence:
Normal space frame 1 prior to anomaly manifestation into DC Airspace. The camera is programmed to fire 1 frame
every second, for 5 hours, totaling 18940 frames. these are 4 frames in 18940, 4/18940, in sequence: The next frame
shows an orange impression prior to object manifestation into the Airspace .
Object initial manifestation . These frames are in sequence, if you do not see the anomaly here, you will see it in the
Object manifestation into the airspace through wormhole. Its a cylinder craft. Enhanced sample and samples
taken the past 3 nights.. Click on image for Slow Motion sequence of frames
Enhanced sample of Cylinder craft manifested through Wormhole. This is the RAW video. The events imaged go by
extremely fast. Camera is programmed to fire 1 frame per second for 5 hours. This video represents over 18
1 second later the anomaly is gone. This action takes place over 2 seconds
3-04-2013 Anomaly Returns, exact same POV as 2-20-2013.
3-04-2013 Anomaly Returns 2
2-17-2013 meteor drop DC B. In a frame by framer analysis, to capture a fast moving object in a single frame is
exceptional. We are looking second by second at action, converted to video. Because you don't see it, does not
mean it is not there. I'm looking frame by frame while you see motion video accelerated. I note the thumbs down
on YouTube. I also not those that did so are perhaps "slow". They can't see the single frame? However; that does
not mean it is not there; just that you can't see it. If you had come here first, you would have understood the
nature of the events. The enhanced frame does show indeed a luminous anomaly. However, on the video it goes
by so fast, you don't see it. Does that mean it is not there?
Cylinder 3-04-2013, however; its luminous Blue
Cylinder UFO imaged 2-17-2013 in Washington DC. Click on image for video
In each of my latest samples, the camera is programmed to fire an image frame every second for 5 hours. Generally
5 hours of video is equal to 18940 frames of images taken. These frames represent 1 frame in 18940 (1/18940). The
odds of such a feat without autonomous operations, is next to impossible, however; such is indeed the case in these
2 new cylinder samples.
Enhanced frame of cylinder 2-17-2013 POV Washington DC
Cylinder 2-20-2013 from exactly the same POV as 2-17-2013. Click on image for video
Enhanced frame of Cylinder UFO 2-20-2013 POV Logan Circle Washington DC
A fitting location for my newest cylinder examples, imaged 2-17/20-2013. How ironic I would capture this anomaly again
however; twice and both times over my home in Washington DC. Please continue to the next samples imaged in
Shreveport LA UFO's (Cylinder)
Shreveport, Louisiana 11-01-2012. In a 550 frame sequence taken at 00:41:45 AM, we have 1 frame which shows a luminous
object and contrail, as it ascends into Shreveport. Atmospheric conditions in Shreveport are poor. There is excessive light and
air pollution in this immediate area. I matched this frame sample to video footage taken in Japan 11-15-2012.
Shreveport, Louisiana 11-01-2012 enhanced sample, shows object and contrail. Frames are taken spaced 5 seconds
apart, and 550 frames total from start to finish. Matching footage filmed in Japan 11-15-2012. Click on image sample
below to access Japan matched footage. Note: The images look 100% alike, however mine is in Shreveport, not Japan
I generated video from the frames. The video has 2 frames before and 2 frames after the event. Video generated in HD
Enhanced frame sample used to match Japan sample. A change in brightness in my sample, shows exactly what is
imaged in Japan 11-15-2012, however in Shreveport. This indicates that whomever operates these anomalies is
based both in Japan and Shreveport Louisiana. Both samples indicate the objects trajectory is ground based. Even
odder, the samples show this object in the same angular flight trajectory. However; what's extraordinary is what
appears after this cylinder flies by! An Orange sphere which cloud like consistency, manifests into the frame, and
flies through the sample while doing a 180 degree turn. I created video and a composite frame to show this UFO
anomaly as it manifested during this sequence of frames.
The faint Orange dots are the anomaly as it manifested into the frames, during the sequence. I created video to
show this anomaly as it flies through the frame. Click on image for HD video analysis. The anomaly, based on the
HD physical samples, manifests into the image area, from out of nowhere? It suddenly appears! Nevertheless, this
object registered digitally on several High Definition TIFF formatted image samples. Note: There are several luminous
Orange anomalies registered on this very unusual image samples. D4 is programmed to fire autonomously, a frame
every 7 seconds. This orange anomaly moved slowly, based on these forensic samples. This image is a composite
of 22 HD image frames taken in this specific sequence. The entire sequence has 1100 frames associated to this
Note: The images look 100% alike, however mine is in Shreveport, not Japan. What are the odds that an image taken
in one part of the world, be taken again, almost 100% exactly the same, however 15 days and thousands of miles
apart? 2 exact physical samples showing exactly the same thing..
Japan UFO 2 December 2012
Metadata Shreveport, shows UFO anomaly in sequence of frames with a contrail 11-01-2012
The Russian Prime Minister and "Aliens living among us"
"Along with the briefcase with nuclear codes, the president of the country is given a special 'top secret' folder.
This folder in its entirety contains information about aliens who visited our planet," Medvedev answered playfully.
It is my opinion that the Russian comments are correct; We are not alone, and aliens are amongst us.
US Capitol Building Cylinder UFO composite 2009 sample
Shreveport Starfield.* POV 45 miles away from Shreveport City proper. Shreveport has photonic pollution
Spatial scan technology programmed to scan every 3 seconds. (Click on image to see spatial scan)
Starfield 70 miles outside of Shreveport was very much like that imaged at AREA 51. Nikon technology used exclusively
in the creation of this work. All Nikon 35 mm film samples are scanned in Nikon Coolscan direct film scan technology.
All HD digital imagery Nikon Advanced DSLR camera and Lens technology. Film rated @ 1600 ISO, processed in RMOS
irradiated film development technology 2000-2008. Film research division has transitioned to large format HD Digital.
Film research is exclusively Infrared film orientation. I shoot 35 mm high speed infrared and developed in chemistry
engineered for the specifics of the shoot. Film technology used only upon special request*
Welber, The UFO Expert on My Big Redneck Vacation: Shreveport party (Click on image for episode). Hosted by
Tom Arnold: My Big Redneck Vacation Host
My (UFOdc.com) Big Redneck Vacation, pass me a beer! "Welber". CMT & I.
CMT's My Big Redneck Vacation: "Shootin' Yur Aylien Frenz Wellber?" (Click on image)
My Big Redneck Vacation is hosted by: Tom Arnold
Sedona Arizona UFO's 10-26-2012/4-07-2013
En route to Sedona, my crew mate and I witnessed a Green object suddenly appear and fly at a 90 degree angle, towards the
ground. For forensic purposes, this report has been placed in the chapter designated to the Green objects I imaged at the
US Capitol Building, July 16, 2002. We have a match to the anomalies I imaged in 2002, however this is now 10-26-2012.
Click on pulsing green sphere below to enter Green UFO analysis. I'm in Sedona, and its 4-05-2013. I just got off the plane,
and setup shop in the courtyard of the Sedona Real. In my first 2 hours of scanning, to my surprise, a Cylinder, like that of
Shreveport, and what I have been imaging over my home in Washington DC for the last 60 days.
Sedona Cylinder 4-05-2013 Enhanced. However; its attributes are slightly different, it appears, as usual, in 1 frame.
My research indicates that it is a recurring event in the Sedona airspace. The frequency of these events further
indicates the possibility of an Extraterrestrial base in the Sedona region. As this research furthers, it will become
evident that the extraterrestrial presence is pro dominant in Sedona, as it is in AREA 51 and Washington DC.
Sedona Cylinder 4-06-2013
Enhanced Sedona Cylinder 4-06-2013
4-07-2013 and a faint luminous object (Cylinder) streaks silently, through the sky.
Sedona 4-07-2013 has to be the most active in regard to extraterrestrial activities. My samples show UFO objects
suddenly materialize within the visual field, where there were none. The inter dimensional transport technology can
be compared to either "Cloaking technology" or "Stargate" technology. In our production, we gathered towns
people which shared their local events and photographic data. I was not surprised to find others with essentially
the same anomalies that I had imaged with my D7000/D4 Nikons. I have matched events taken with 2 independent
cameras, showing the same things, however under different conditions. The D7000 is limited to 25600 ISO, and
in extreme conditions such as the desert night, is not suitable for these extreme conditions at Night. A camera
with extreme sensitivity would be my first selection. D4
Event 2, 10 minutes later 4-07-2013
Event 3, 5 minutes later.....4-07-2013
Event 4, again 3-5 minutes later
Frame 2 of Event 4 UFO anomaly. Its rear to capture an anomaly (UFO) in multiple sequential frames, however;
I'm about to prove this wrong, in a demonstration of UFO materialization on video.
Sedona 4-07-2013 reference frame free of airborne anomalies (UFO). At this point, I'm compelled to connect the
dots. What I imaged in Sedona on video, was imaged on HD stills in AREA 51. At that time, I did not have a full
understanding of the technology I had. As demonstrated in Sedona 4-07-2013, I have a full understanding of
the technology and it's capabilities. That understanding lead to this documentation. With concise analysis and
data (visual samples), I am able to conclude Extraterrestrial technology is in use in the airspace of Sedona AZ.
Initial manifestation of UFO in Sedona 4-07-2013. Object is partially visible as a streak. These samples are all 20 mm
perspective from essentially the same POV as 10-26-2012 in Sedona (Object drops out of warp, and stops) Click on
above image to see extraordinary UFO entrance into Sedona Airspace (Please play in 1080 Full Screen Mode)
Object is now fully manifested into the airspace. To preserve space, I have created a composite and slow motion
video of this event. RAW video (Click on image above)
Please click on the composite image below for the slow motion video analysis of this event
RILEY MARTIN: "The great UFO photographer Wilbur Allen has taken
unprecedented photos of UFOs. He is a great sensitive, even on par
with myself. This (sample) appears to me to be a 'Quantum Window'.
Some will call it a 'Stargate' or a 'Wormhole". Wilbur's work is of
the utmost importance for humans on earth today. Stay tuned."
Click on image to see slow motion video
Sedona Cylinder 4-07-2013. This object manifested from a dark area in space. The location is the same as the first
time I imaged an object come out of the sky 10-26-2012. Its in the same area and flying in the same direction as that
which I imaged in my first expedition. This is proof that the anomalies manifested from deep space and into our airspace.
I have the same event imaged in AREA 51* 10-12-2012, while filming for My Big Redneck Vacation (CMT/MTV). I updated
the info in the AREA 51 chapter
Approximately 30 minutes later, the Luminous UFO anomaly returned, however in another flight trajectory. In its
approach, the anomaly lighted the tree tops. I have selected the frames which illustrate this event. I start with a
normal frame, and progress to the luminous flyby, which is composited, due to space limitations. These frames
are on Wilbur Allen (UFOdc) YouTube Channel
Frame 2, and the treetop is now somewhat illuminated, by an unknown airborne source? upon further analysis
it is determined that the source of light is the luminous object, which entered this airspace through a wormhole.
Treetop is now totally luminous, and the level of light is pure white. The frames that follow, show a luminous white
object warp into outer space after the close flyby of my room, which was directly in front of these trees. The remainder
of the frames are seen in this extraordinary multi frame composite:
Upon lighting the tree tops as if scanning for something, the anomaly quickly warps into outer space. Click on
image sample to see this extraordinary event.
Roxy Lopez: Interview 2
Sudden manifestation of UFO in real time. Sedona 4-08-2013. Click on image to access real time video+
4-08-2013 Sedona, and cylinder object suddenly appears in the frames. This is example 2 of 5 showing this sudden
materialization of UFO anomalies Sedona 4-08-2013: UFO sudden manifestation . Just as in 4-07-2013 , this sequence
of frames shows a UFO anomaly, suddenly manifest within the image area. This indicates that the technology imaged utilizes
dimensional transport technology which allows them (ET) to materialize in any given airspace. This wormhole/Stargate
technology is clearly demonstrated on my HD video samples. Click on image for Slow Motion Video
Cylinder (faint) Sedona 4-08-2013
Cylinder 2 Sedona 4-08-2013
Bradshaw Ranch (Daylight) UFO scan (no activity) Click on image for time-lapse video
For the analysis of the Bradshaw Ranch, during the day, I shot 2 kinds of video: Time lapse video filmed at 1/8000th
of a second, every second for 1 hour, which resulted in the above video sample. In the time lapse sequences, I was
unable to detect UFO activity, however; I shot video at 30 frames per second using a shutter speed of 1/8000th of
a second. It's in the video footage, that I discovered extraordinary inconsistencies in the files. One such
inconsistency was found in a frame. A frame being the key word, my findings are essential a single frame in the
Airborne anomalies in a single frame of video, taken at the Bradshaw Ranch 4-10-2013. I am referencing a single frame
in a video stream taken on location. My video was set for maximum definition: The 20 mm lens is fully closed down, set
to it's smallest (largest F-Stop of F-22). It's focus field is set to infinity. With 30 frames per second video film rate using
a shutter speed of 1/8000th of a second. The field of focus with maximum depth of field from the minimal focus point
of the lens (0.25 meters) to infinity are in place. That means everything is in focus within the range of the lens using
1/8000th of a second @ 12800 ISO. There should be no blurring associated to motion based on the definition of the
video file, yet there is? Click on image for video Time Lapse analysis
Airborne anomalies with the consistency of the mountains they are in front of! If these were organic definitions,
birds or insects in flight, they would have appeared in numerous frames, however; not just one. Their flight
configuration is puzzling also? If these were 2 birds in flight, they would not be perpendicular to each other as
these 2 anomalies are.
Non conformity to any known flight worthy object, aircraft, bird or insect. In the case of bird or insect, the
conditions of the shoot would have made them visible in multiple frames, not as a singularity, which these frames
represent. Click on image for video analysis NOte they are the exact color texture as the mountains and
geography of Sedona and the Bradshaw Ranch. The additional imagery from this session are equally abstract!
For the next example, I am forced to start with a reference frame, devoid of any unusual activities.
Bradshaw Ranch static shot devoid of any activities. Again, this is standard video (30 frames per second at 1/8000th
of a second shutter speed. There is nothing out of the ordinary with this single frame sample. However; note the next
frame and the cloud like anomaly directly in line with the clouds.
Cloud anomaly UFO. Anomaly is enlarged below.
Cloud anomaly moved at extreme velocity. The cloud anomaly looks like a saucer in this single image file. It's below
the clouds, and for you to see it in this sample, you must reference the first frame which shows nothing where this
object is seen in this frame.
Enhanced sample of cloud anomaly imaged at the Bradshaw Ranch. In the very next frame, the cloud turns into
blue spheres, which are visible. For this I made a composite of the frames. These are video frames, and we are
looking at the event based on a frame by frame analysis at 30 frames per second using 1/8000th of a second
shutter speed. That means what I'm showing you takes place within 1 frame in 30 taken in 1 second. Under normal
conditions, and viewing the video in real time, we would not see a thing, it happens so fast! However; if we slow
down the speed they become apparent. Your not going to find them looking at the video as video in real time.
Composite frame of the next 5 frames in the sequence of frames. Note the cloud anomaly, however for the sake
of argument, I provided a map to the events in this sample. Click on image above to see slow motion frame by
frame action of this cloud UFO at high velocity.
Remote POV of imaged sample below, Sedona Arizona 10-26-2012. 3/4 Quarter Moon served as adequate lighting.
Full Color Nightvision
Remote POV 2 Sedona Arizona. Sector where images are taken was and is unknown to me. I was in absolute darkness
I had several POV's to sample from. On some, luminous anomalies appeared, which were 100% consistent with objects
imaged in AREA 51 and Shreveport.
From this POV, I imaged several frames which showed vectoring luminous white objects. The frames are consistent in quality
to the cylinder imaged in Shreveport/Japan. The frames where programmed to fire every 3 seconds. This frame is a
reference frame for the samples which show the vectoring luminous objects. The anomalies had contrails associated
This vector is consistent with that which was imaged in Shreveport and AREA 51, however, apparently farther from
the lens POV as in Shreveport.
Anomaly has contrail associated to its forwards trajectory. Generally, such a contrail would be associated to the
UFO objects propulsion technology
Objects contrail and luminous qualities are consistent with objects imaged in AREA 51 and Shreveport. Note objects
contrail, and the fact this is not a meteor. Additional samples taken from this POV, showed the manifestation of
luminous objects, in an airspace where there were none. The samples registered as streaks, consistent with this and
other samples obtained in different geographic locations. How extraordinary that these frames take place within 2 (two)
minutes of each other, from the same POV . I generated HD video of this extraordinary documentation . Please click on
the image sample above.
From this POV, I obtained several samples of interest. However, this is frame #1 of 2 in this sequence.
Frame 1 of object registered on sample, during spatial scan of remote POV in Sedona Arizona. Object entered into
the frame POV in a perpendicular trajectory
Enhanced frame sample of UFO anomaly imaged in 2 frames of this sequence. This is frame 1 of 2, and the object
enters into the frame at this point. I'm not sure if this is the object entering into the atmosphere, or through a
wormhole, as discussed by my associate: Dr. Edgar MItchell
Enhanced further, the object registers as nothing conventional or within our level of technology. I advance to the
next frame taken in this sequence of frames. Notes made during my lecture with Dr. Edgar Mitchell, indicate that
Apollo astronauts encountered and witnessed extraterrestrial technology in space. These anomalies are consistent
with NASA JPL files, imaged in Space and on the Moon.
Frame 2 of 2 frames imaged in sequence taken in desert POV Sedona Arizona. The anomaly has a familiar
configuration, much like that imaged in Shreveport Louisiana, at top of this page, and following this sample.
Enhanced sample of frame 2 anomaly, imaged from remote POV Sedona Arizona. The angular velocity of this frame
sample, is exactly the same as frame 1. We are able to gauge the trajectory of this object based on these 2 files.
Enhanced further, this anomaly could indeed pass for the anomaly imaged in Shreveport Louisiana, however is smaller
though thicker than the object in Louisiana.
Composite frames of event anomaly
For a point of reference, to show the luminous qualities of these Sedona samples under a 3/4 Moon, the following
image sample is the basis (optically) for this analysis. Though it looks very bright, it is absolutely dark according
to my eyes.
Terrestrial scan Sedona Arizona. Non eventful, however; exceptional video in this 30 minutes duration sample
It's looped 9 times for absorption (mental) purposes.
3/4 Moon optical conditions on all imaged samples, as based on this reference frame. Its rather dark, however that's
not what the D4 Nikon see's.
Reference file 2 Sedona Arizona @ 3AM. Camera sensitivity at 100000 ISO generates an unreal representation of
what was seen, which based from my point of view, this image is not what I saw. This looks like daylight, however
it's pitch black based on what my eyes are seeing. Thank You Bob James (3AM) (Warner Brothers Records)
I took many frames, in which anomalies would be present. This is a reference frame for the following showing luminous
vectoring objects in Sedona Airspace.
The object appears in this frame only, however is enhanced in the following frame
Luminous object enhanced. These anomalies showed up on several frames, however faintly. They were visible in
Within this frame sample, is a luminous cylinder object. It's level of luminosity was faint, however it is visible in the
comparative analysis of this sequence of images.
The faint vector is detectable within the HD TIFF file in which it was generated. In the next frame, 3 seconds later
the anomaly is gone. The frame had to be enhanced in the area of the anomaly for it to be visible in a Web resolution.
Following frame 3 seconds later minus luminous streak, which could not be found in any additional frames, until a
large object, silently drops out of warp* These are 20 mm optical frame perspectives. The anomaly imaged in the
following frames composite, was huge! By showing reference frames, we are able to gauge proximity of anomalies.
Click on image for enhanced video analysis (AVID Media Composer 6.5)
Object drops out of warp, and decelerates, before stopping. Object, upon initial manifestation was enshroud
in cloud matter. The cloud matter dissipated as the object stopped. Frame 1 sample. I created a composite frame
with the entire chain of events, below. However, I did enhance each frame to show this objects progression and
discharge of smaller objects into the air, below. All imaged files in Sedona are filmed in HD TIFF/RAW formats. TIFF
files had to be converted to JPEG for analysis. However; the TIFF files are saved in a native format to JPEG images.
Frame 2 of objects entrance into cameras POV perspective. Object is slowing down, and cloud matter is fading.
Frame 3: Object is decelerating and cloud matter is dissipating considerably. As object slowed, it discharged smaller
objects into the air. The following frames are the enhanced analysis of this event. Entire event is composited into 1
20 mm lens perspective
I created a composite frame
with the entire chain of events, below. However, I did enhance each frame to show this objects progression and
discharge of smaller objects into the air, below. All imaged files in Sedona are filmed in HD TIFF/RAW formats. TIFF
files had to be converted to JPEG for analysis. However; the TIFF files are saved in a native format to JPEG images.
I imaged something "warp" into the frame and slow down. Taken from remote location in Sedona Arizona (Click on image)
I was unnerved by the silence then all of a sudden, every dog and coyote in the area started howling. Even creepier, I felt
watched, and was possibly examined by an unknown force which drew blood from my finger*. The wound still exists and is
most unusual: a small orifice in front of a larger underlying perfectly circular wound.
*Finger below. I filmed aircraft on a takeoff vector from Ronald Reagan National Airport. I was unable to recreate what
I imaged in Sedona or AREA 51? At the Washington Monument 12-01-2012, I imaged both the Monument and the
US Capitol Building using high speed video technology Video in low light, imaged at 30 frames per second using
1/8000th of a second shutter speeds to do video capture. That means 30 frames of images at 1/8000th of a
second or 30 frames of super fast action within 1 second of action. If its moving faster than the shutter speed
its going to register as a blur, and I have blurred frames and long streaks of light in images taken at this
exceptional shutter speed.
Frame 1 of anomaly shows this object entered into the frame with some velocity associated too it. Object drops out
of warp. It is enshroud in cloud like matter. Generally, an aircraft leads it's contrails, and is not enshroud in them.
Matching sample reported by Huffington Post in Kentucky 10-16-2012
2. Object is slowing down. These frames are enlargements of frames imaged using a 20 mm lens. 20 mm is considered
wide angle. It recorded a 94 degree image area sweep from a left to right perspective. In this 20 mm perspective, the
anomaly is imaged as a loge streak with red and white light associated to it. Generally, correct for all aircraft based
on military and commercial navigation light configurations. However; these frames are imaged film 90 degrees straight
up? If this was a conventional aircraft, where are the wing and tail lights that are on all aircraft? I sampled an aircraft
and placed that sample below to show the validity of the sample through a comparative analysis. Kentucky
10-16-2012 click on image above
3. As the object came to rest, the enshroud cloud matter dissipated. However; there is still a partial contrail
associated to this object in deceleration. 20 mm lens perspective
4. This frame shows the anomaly now with several green spheres, attached to it. They are discharged from the
object as it slowed down. As this was being imaged, the dogs and coyotes in the area, started howling. It was
5. The spheres are being discharged from the object as it comes to rest. The cameras sensitivity would have clearly
shown the physical characteristics (if any), of this unusual rod like anomaly. It is perhaps a match top that imaged
above in Shreveport Louisiana 11-01-2012 and in Japan 11-15-2012, imaged above, at the open of this site..
6. As it slows, almost to stop, there is still a contrail associated to this anomaly. It leads the contrail. Because these
frames are all imaged at relative constant settings,i.e.; every frame is the same focus, F-stop, shutter speed, and
overall exposure settings, everything is the same except for the subjective sample registered at that given point
in time, during exposure. With exactness in each frame, we can calculate this objects forwards velocity, which I
deferred to Dr. Bruce Maccabee.
Frame 7 Object at rest, however, there is no physical definition associated to the sample, even at rest? Shooting
straight up, I should see the wing and tail lights as it passes over? I cannot. 20 mm lens perspective
Final frame of the sequence (9 frames). Object has flight lights which are inconsistent with conventional aircraft, and was devoid
of visible wings, which when photographed, would appear as wings in the imaged sample. The sample would show the physical
characteristics of an aircraft, based on my physical documentation of aircraft at night. It leads its contrail and is not enshroud
within it, as this 7 frame sample demonstrates. I have additional frames taken from an additional POV in Sedona. There I
imaged 500 frames, 2 of which showed an object enter into the image area perspective (POV).
Based on POV of these sample files, I am able to triangulate the trajectory of this anomaly.
The return of this anomaly is extraordinary! Imaged 4-07-2013 from almost the exact location as the 10-26-2012
UFO event, examined by the BBC. How ironic, that though we filmed specifically for UFO events, none happened until
after hours? Though we stopped our program filming, I never stopped my cameras from recording those hours we
were not working? I had a prime location to film from at my hotel, The Sedona Real'. An excellent hotel; however;
after dark, enter into their courtyard at your own risk! That is one absolutely creepy location late at night! My images
indicate that this is indeed a creepy spot, late at night!
The anomaly returns however, with another anomaly, much like that imaged coming out of the wormhole.
I have this object coming and going from this camera POV.
Anomalies in motion 4-07-2013 Sedona. This red and white modulating anomaly is no stranger to Sedona.
Imaged in Sedona 2000.
Triangulated trajectory of UFO plotted over this mountain, which is the Bradshaw Ranch. We went there to film
on my BBC/Discovery channel special. On the expedition we went to mountain tops, known to be energy vortexes.
To my surprise, on 1 test shot, I imaged the red and white UFO anomaly, again: I did not notice these frames recorded
to a separate memory card in the D4. City lighting (Sedona), illuminated the sky, in this 102400 ISO sample. I'm using
a 16 mm 2.8 Fisheye Nikkor Lens. I'm shooting 90 degree's straight up. The D4 has exceptional light assessment
capabilities, which I experimented with. Based on this frame, we can see the surrounding mountains in extreme
Enhanced sample of singular UFO
Enhanced further we see the object was stationary
Optical conditions of the shoot, are as illustrated. However; I went to 102400 ISO to look at the adjacent mountains
Adjacent perspective, Sedona Mountain top vortex. I went 2 stops slower, to 1/6th of a second
Advanced scan, Sedona Mountain top in complete darkness. Full Color Night Vision, 16 mm Fisheye perspective.
Do not let this fool you! To my eyes, I could barely see the lights on the trucks parked to the left of the frame!
The blue lighting, to the left, is attributed to LED lighting used by the camera crew. This sequence is taken during
our weather balloon test, to determine if what I imaged 10-26-2012 was a weather balloon lighted with "Glow Sticks"
or Green Laser. Green UFO in Sedona 10-2012
Aircraft and contrail at Night. We clearly see the navigation lights of this aircraft, and that it leads its contrails. Each
contrail is associated to an engine discharging water vapor, a component of JP Jet fuel. I was raised USAF on bases
with advanced aircraft tactical aircraft. My father was a field Aircraft Engineer for the F-106 Delta Dart, supersonic
fighter interceptors. Cold War technology. I understand aircraft and flight avionics. I design and build drones (RC)
airplanes, and am a master builder. You don't get to work on Air Force One, if you're a Moron. There are No Special
Ed functions on this level or any level aircraft. I think I am able to assert ain the difference in a conventional aircraft
and that which I imaged in AREA 51 and Sedona. To tell me what I imaged is an aircraft if you were not there is
illogical? How does one say what something is, if they did not see it, or were not present at the time and location of
the event to make a valid assessment of the objects in question? I would rather they remain silent, than to speak
with knowledge of that which they know not! 20 mm lens perspective I imaged some rather unusual anomalies in the
air, while in the desert of Sedona. 2 frames in particular showed an object enter into the image frame POV in a
perpendicular trajectory .Further, I am able to differentiate aircraft navigation lighting and structural definition, to
an extent, of aircraft in flight.
Helicopter from duration scan 2-13-2013 Washington DC
Aircraft, high altitude 3-10-2013
In a 60 frame sequence taken from Sedona Hotel courtyard, 2 luminous objects appear in this frame only. This sample
has images spaced 10 seconds apart. Because they appear in this frame only, I will use it as a reference in this event.
Taken using Nikon D7000 and DX 10 MM Fisheye, at 20000 ISO. I enhanced the anomalies in the samples below:
Enhanced sample 1. They appear in this frame only. Composite video made of this event, shows 2 frames before and
after This frame. Anomalies appear in the upper left quarter of this frame.
Very unusual anomalies, with one leading the other. They both have like but different flight trajectories, This indicates
there are 2 objects and not one in flight.
Very unusual extreme enlargements, which indicates 2 separate objects in close formation.
Looks like daylight, however, its pitch dark according to my eyes.
Sedona POV unknown. I walked in the dark without light, following the road into darkness. However; this sample is
misleading. The optical quality based on my eyes, was not this spectacular. D4 Nikon has extraordinary light
gathering capabilities. These are 100000 ISO with a F-2.8 20 mm Nikkor lens. I use Nikon technology exclusively.
NIkon Professional Services (NPS)
Sedona extreme low light imagery using Moon light as key lighting. However please note I am a professional photographer
Coyotes Attack: I am so lucky, I was stalked by coyotes in Sedona. During the entry of the luminous anomaly
which stopped above my head in the Sedona
National Geographic QuickExplore: Wilbur Allen
Extreme terrestrial scan technology allows for imaging in "no light" environments, such as deserts. In extreme
environments with limited light, the camera sensitivity responds much like that of HUBBLE with a range of 50
to 204800 ISO. These samples are not generated in conventional technology. 20 mm lens perspective
Generally, a camera is placed in a remote location, and programmed to fire images autonomously for a designated
period of time. In the Sedona scan, a 20 mm lens is used in order to cover as much of the sky as possible. A 20 mm
lens covers a 94 degree image area. Fisheye 10 mm was used in AREA 51, covering a 180 degree image area sweep.
I use Nikon Advanced Systems D4
An unusual finger wound, a very small entrance wound, on top of a much larger hole in my finger. I had this upon
exiting the desert in Sedona. I felt totally unnerved by whatever transpired while I was lost, alone in the desert.
Based on what I am experiencing, I cannot discount the possibility that blood may have been drawn, while I was
spooked. They move at accelerated speeds, and can do things faster than you can imagine. Based on my high
speed research, this is a very strong possibility.
Metadata associated to imaged find* Sedona AZ. I will post the Metadata impressions of each image to assure the
authenticity of each imaged anomaly
Sedona Arizona, Moon light digital sample. 100000 ISO D4 20 mm lens perspective
Russian UFO 2
AREA 51 Nevada UFO's
What I witnessed, felt, and imaged at AREA 51 was not consistent with technology I am familiar with*.
Based on all "known" levels of technology, I am safe to assume that, that which I imaged (below)
was not humanly possible, perhaps extraterrestrial. Thank you Gianni Lo Giudice
Thank you CBS News*
CBS Evening News with Scott Pelley
UFO's (again) at the Washington Monument July 4, 2012
UFOdc.com now has paid advertisements. UFOdc is not responsible for the contents or claims of these advertisements.
UFOdc.com is a featured speaker at this Scottish Event . I will perform several scans on Loch Ness and Scottish
airspace while I'm there. My presentation will be based on UFOdc.com research/forensic data.
Robert Stanley's UNICUS Radio Hour
Coast to Coast 11-12-2012 (Click image to enter)
A Cowboy's Dream in Nevada: Click on image* Basecamp of UFOdc.com during AREA 51 Expedition (Click on image)
A Cowboys Dream is absolutely extraordinary!
UFOdc.com: My Big Redneck Vacation on CMT
AREA 51: UFOdc.com was Here! During my initial visit, I documented several airborne anomalies,
one of which registered in the image below as a swirl. For this to happen in a 2 second exposure,
this object would have to move at an extreme velocity.
At the Gate of AREA 51, I was communicated too by the objects I was imaging above my head. The
telepathic contact spooked me consummately! It was telling me to pack my gear and get out of the
area! If not for my associates, which witnessed my personal demeanor change while filming at the
perimeter of the base. I was not concerned with the facilities of AREA 51, the base, however;
more in the airspace above AREA 51, which I captured. In each region I ventured in AREA 51,
each was Restricted airspace and devoid of aircraft, that I could visibly see or capture. I was
also examined based on physical injuries I sustained while filming in the desert in Sedona.
Unnerving even more, while imaging in Sedona, as a large object drops out of warp, and stops
directly above my head, in the silence, all the coyotes and dogs started howling. I was then
ready to go! I got messages from these objects, and had them respond to my wish for them
to been seen, on video and by request or command of that which I imaged.
Was this an Omen for things too come? Photo by Alexa Poletti
In the upper left region of the frame, a luminous streak, which vanishes in the very next frame, taken in high speed
mode. 10 mm Fisheye (DX) perspective, Nikon D4, 100000 ISO.
Map of anomaly. In the very next frame taken in high speed sequence mode, the anomaly is gone. Its the same
type of image taken in Sedona and Shreveport, in regard to the consistency of the luminous cylinder anomaly
Enhanced image area showing luminous vectoring anomaly . Anomaly is a match to objects imaged an hour later in
AREA 51 proper and in a sample obtained in Sedona, imaged above in the Sedona chapter.
In this frame taken a millisecond later, the streak/ anomaly is gone. Generally, I would have this anomaly in several
frames, however based on this sequence, it appears in 1 frame only? Nevertheless, it is consistent with samples in
At a remote location in the desert, I programmed a D4 Nikon, to fire an image, every 10 seconds.
In this stream of images were 2 frames, which showed an orange anomaly, pulsing in the airspace
above the remote camera POV. A luminous object would have to enter within the POV image field to
be imaged as such. I have attempted to recreate this image using CGI (Autodesk 3dsmax) technology.
To do so, my 3D recreation would require the same specifications (shutter speed 2 seconds per exposure).
I create a 2 second video with a pulsing orange luminous anomaly. Within the 2 seconds, I tried to recreate
the pulse pattern, using this original as a template.
I could not replicate this event?
The object moved at an extreme velocity. To look at this frame, I had to enhance it optically. My enhancements:
These are 2 second exposures, programmed to fire every 10
seconds. In this one of 2 frames, sampled from 250 images (programmed), is an etching anomaly
(orange) which pulsed, quickly through this frame. For this frame to exist, indicted that this
object moved quickly through the duration of the exposure (2 seconds) It is most difficult to
recreate this event using Autodesk 3dsmax technology. Considering the duration of this exposure,
I would have to create a 3D object, and track this created object over the trajectory imaged in the desert
sample. I am sure the recreation would show that whatever this object is, it moved quickly to be
registered as such.
The anomaly exited into space and moved at an exceptional velocity to register as such in a digital exposure. The
object appears within the span of the exposure, to be pulse propulsion technology. A technology discussed by my
associate Dr. Edgar Mitchell. Samples of our lecture are posted below, in the Green UFO section. The sample object
output luminescence, and could not have been illuminated from light sources around the cameras POV. I have this
object in another sequence of frames, flying in a straight trajectory. I'm still processing information relative to this
event, and have never generated such a large output of physical data, as in these expeditions.
What I imaged here, was perhaps imaged a few moments ago, as I performed my random
period scan of the night time skies over my home at 04:00 AM 11-11-2012.
I cannot explain this one frame. My camera POV was away from any and all possible light sources, and the camera
rear curtain (eye piece) is closed. There is no possible light entrance into the camera other than through the lens.
I created video of this frame event by adding 2 frames before and 2 frames after, to show continuity. For this to
happen, indicates, based on the levels of intensity, that an object with light levels in ultraviolet, generally difficult
for humans to see and process, if such an object would pass in front of them. Based on this sample, the object
passed from left to right, extremely close to the lens (20 mm 2.8 Nikkor) at a high rate of velocity. Are UFOs now
in a light range, obviously non recognizable to the human eye? My data indicates this is the case! Again, physical
documentation adds to the equation, variables yet unconsidered in regards to UFOs. I did a further analysis of this
frame, however looking at it in terms of the sequence of frames taken. After this flash of ultraviolet light, an object
enters into the frame from out of nowhere? I generated video from the entire sequence
Ultraviolet blue streak imaged in a sequence of frames in Sedona Arizona indicates that whatever I imaged in
AREA 51, was indeed an extraterrestrial anomaly, however, moving at high velocity and in space. This frame clearly
(though in the ultraviolet range) shows an airborne anomaly that has consistency with the POV frame (blue) imaged
above in AREA 51. Ultraviolet anomaly sample, enhanced below.
An enhanced frame (brightness) showing the diagonal blue streak imaged in this extraordinary frame in Sedona.
Though enhanced, the anomaly to some, would be difficult to see under these circumstances. How then can humans
be so non assuming, if we don't see it, it's not there? It's what we don't see that's most disturbing! The "unseen".
Rachel Nevada; terrestrial scan. All terrestrial scans are performed autonomously, programmed for a duration of
time, and generally captured in HD video format. Some samples on these pages are HD video frame extracts. The
utilization of NASA grade technology in the analysis of UFO activities. Nikon D4
Modulating red/white anomaly flies through a sequence of frames, programmed to fire every 10 seconds. This is
Restricted AirSpace, and there should be nothing in the air, yet there is? What I imaged was other worldly, as
demonstrated by these samples, which defy relative conditions. Imaged in the starfield what is referred to as the
Dark Rift. It shows as Nebula matter in these extraordinary samples. How extraordinary, to have another
photographer ( Italian fashion photographer and UFO researcher) Gianni Lo Giudice, take the same objects
with his cameras, at the same time this sample was being imaged by my cameras. His images are a 100%
Che cosa straordinaria, di avere un altro
fotografo (fotografo di moda italiana e ricercatore UFO) Gianni Lo Giudice, prendere gli stessi oggetti
con le sue telecamere, allo stesso tempo, questo campione era stato ripreso dalle mie macchine fotografiche.
Le sue immagini sono al 100% corrispondono.
Again, Gianni's images, which are an independent point of view, confirm samples taken by my camera sampling Restricted Airspace
AREA 51. Gianni and his Super Model wife, stayed in A Cowboy's Dream as guest. I was most impressed in his Crop Circle research,
which based on his discussion, substantiated facts regarding cellular deformations inherint to authenticated crop circles. Plants within
these circles, showed deformations at the molecular level, consistent with microwaved pop corn
Anche in questo caso, le immagini di Gianni, che sono un punto di vista indipendente, confermano campioni prelevati dalla mia macchina fotografica di
campionamento dello spazio aereo limitato
AREA 51. Gianni e sua moglie Super Model, ha soggiornato in Sogno di una Cowboy come ospite. Mi ha colpito molto nella sua ricerca Crop Circle,
che sulla base della sua discussione, fatti documentati relativi a cellulare inherint deformazioni di cerchi nel grano autenticati. Le piante all'interno
questi cerchi, ha mostrato deformazioni a livello molecolare, in linea con microonde pop corn
Composite of airborne anomaly in No Fly Zone. Click on image sample to access terrestrial scan of AREA 51. The scan
shows objects being tracked throughout the sample, then suddenly vanishing. It also shows an object being discharged
from a cluster of objects stationary with the frames. Click on image sample above to see video from frames taken.
Looking at the physical samples, from a left POV perspective. The object is moving from left frame to center, and passes
behind a small mountain. However, it never comes from behind the mountain? There are no bases or airports in
This restricted NoFly zone airspace.
Enhanced sample showing airborne object in No Fly Zone. While filming, I felt watched, though I knew I was totally
alone. I setup my camera to film video. In doing so, I said: "Show it to me". Within 15 seconds of my command, the
object (cloaked), did indeed, show itself to me. This video is proof there exists telepathic communication between
these objects and those they choose to communicate with. The streaks become longer as the object approaches
the rear of the mountain. However, there should be a streak associated to the rear light, yet this is not the case
as this object decelerates.
AVID Media Composer 6.5 ASREA 51 sequence template. In the case of extreme low light, a sequence of stills
fired in rapid succession, animated and accelerated in AVID 64 bit advanced editing technology, adequately
demonstrates motion activity within the programmed duration of images. Generally, autonomously fired from
remote POV's, in any given sample location. Click on POV 6 Media Composer image above for the video associated
to this AREA. Duration of imagery: 1 Hour compressed to 20 seconds.
BORIS BCC applied to all UFOdc HD Video (+25800-204800 ISO NR)
http://www.giannilogiudicephoto.com/ Secondary POV of air traffic in Restricted airspace taken by Gianni. How then does
one not conclude based on these physical samples, that extraterrestrial technology is indeed in this airspace.
http://www.giannilogiudicephoto.com/ POV secondaria del traffico aereo nello spazio aereo limitato presa da Gianni. Come poi fa
non concludere sulla base di questi campioni fisici, che la tecnologia extraterrestre è proprio in questo spazio aereo.
http://www.giannilogiudicephoto.com/ Gianni's extraordinary physical documentation of objects in AREA 51
Straordinaria documentazione fisica di Gianni di oggetti in AREA 51
Area 51 airborne anomaly* (Click on image)
Imaged over AREA 51, a luminous anomaly, which I witnessed imaged during investigation of this airspace. At this
point of sampling, I received a telepathic communication from one of the 2 objects, slithering in flight above my
head. It told me to: to "Pack my shit" in those words! I complied immediately upon receiving the command! Within
1 minute of returning to my crew van, an unmarked US Government van jetted out the main gate, doing about
60-70 mph. If I had still been at my POV, and dressed in black, I would have been hit by the fast moving van! I was
with Riley Martin, Eron McCauley and Gianni Lo Giudice. Gianni took pictures. His images are considered a continuation
of what I had been imaging, however; Gianni's images are from his POV perspectives in some cases. In most instances
our images are taken from generally the same POV's. We have established forensic credibility in the documentation of
unknown airborne anomalies in the Restricted Airspace designated as AREA 51. (UFO) We are dealing with forensic
documentation. Digital data: metadata digital information embedded into the imaged samples. This indicates authenticity
of the image file, and a lack of augmentation (modification) in Photoshop or any other image altering program. Hopefully
removing all doubt, the facts speak for them selves.
Ripreso su AREA 51, un'anomalia luminosa, che ho assistito ripreso durante l'indagine dello spazio aereo. a questo
punto di campionamento, ho ricevuto una comunicazione telepatica da uno dei 2 oggetti, scivolando in volo sopra la mia
testa. Mi ha detto di: a "Pack mia merda" in quelle parole! Ho rispettato immediatamente dopo aver ricevuto il comando! entro
1 minuto di tornare al mio furgone equipaggio, un marcato governo degli Stati Uniti van schizzava fuori il cancello principale, facendo per
60-70 mph. Se fossi stato ancora il mio POV, e vestita di nero, che sarebbe stato colpito dal furgone in rapido movimento! sono stato
con Riley Martin, Eron McCauley e Gianni Lo Giudice. Gianni ha fatto delle foto. Le sue immagini sono considerate una continuazione
di quello che era stato l'imaging, però, Gianni immagini sono dalle sue prospettive POV in alcuni casi. Nella maggior parte dei casi
le nostre immagini sono prese dal generalmente gli stessi di POV. Abbiamo stabilito la credibilità forense nella documentazione di
sconosciuti anomalie aerei nello spazio aereo limitato designato come AREA 51. (UFO) Abbiamo a che fare con la medicina legale
documentazione. I dati digitali: le informazioni sui metadati digitali incorporati nei campioni sotto forma di immagini. Questo indica autenticità
del file di immagine, e la mancanza di aumento (modifica) in Photoshop o qualsiasi altro programma che modifica altra immagine. fiduciosamente
la rimozione di ogni dubbio, i fatti parlano da loro stessi.
Area 51 airborne anomaly* (Click on image), imaged at the gate perimeter of AREA 51. After the command to move
my gear, sent by one of the objects, an unmarked US Government van exited AREA 51, and sped past my moved POV.
If I had still been in that spot, I most certainly would have been hit by the speeding van! Did this anomaly save my life?
As a child, my father was stationed at Lowery AFB in Colorado. He was redeployed to Vietnam via Castle AFB in California.
To get to Castle, we drove through the area in Nevada which was known as AREA 51. I saw a white dot, zig-zagging
in space! When I mentioned it to my father, he stepped on the gas, and accelerated his speed to an uncomfortable
level, to get out of Dodge, quickly! How odd, I should capture that anomaly (s) in this expedition into AREA 51.
This object did not conform too conventional aircraft, and is consistent with what I imaged over Baltimore Maryland 8-03-2008
NASA supportive data associated to this sample, please click on image. What was imaged in space is imaged in the air over
Rachel Nevada. I have samples which shows objects suddenly appear or break formation fly forwards then vanish. With
supportive physical samples to substantiate my claims. I must note that this is not the first time I witnessed the zig-zagging
luminous white anomaly. My first encounter was as a child in 4th grade, leaving Denver Colorado and traveling to Castle AFB
in California (SAC).
It was brought to my attention, that there would be an issue validating the imaged samples, due to advancements in 3D/CGI
technology. However; my files were generated with a D4 Nikon, which included the technical specifications too all the imaged
samples taken from the gate perimeter of AREA 51. For the sake of argument, it is required to show the validity of the imaged
files taken directly from AREA 51. In this query, frames UFE_8109-8113. 5 frames taken in sequence from film location, POV
AREA 51. Based on information provided by Stanton Friedman, the slithering anomaly is no secret to those around AREA 51*
I note the flight characteristics of these anomalies, and that of the Teardrop Anomaly imaged over Baltimore Harbor in 2008.
The samples highlighted in gray are frames showing the luminous object slithering through the air. Object zig zagged as did an
object imaged in 2008 over Baltimore. Nevertheless, the images have their exposure data, and system signature, embedded as
Metadata profile. All professional digital images have the system impression, embedded within its image data profile. The images
are indeed, Authentic. The anomalies flight characteristics (zig-zagging) is common among UFO's. That's clearly indicated in my
Baltimore 8-03-2008 samples of the Teardrop Mothership imaged over Baltimore Harbor.
Frame 1 of 5, full frame perspective of vectoring luminous anomalies over AREA 51. The 2 objects moved
perpendicular to each other in perhaps an intercept course with each other. Whatever they are, they are
a pair. Objects paired were imaged over the US Capitol Building July 16, 1952 and July 16, 2002 (below)
Object vectoring through space, in 1 of 5 exposures taken 90 degrees looking up from ground POV, AREA 51. This is an
enlarged section, roughly 5-10% of the imaged area, containing this anomaly. I of 2 objects in flight, sampled on all frames.
I created a frame analysis of this lead object, as it slithered through space during this imaged duration. Click on image.
I have a large volume of physical data, which indicates that these objects enter and exit through self generated wormholes.
On the link above , be sure to tell your followers to click on "March 2013" then yesterdays date and then click on Hour 2.
My analysis based on continuous frames, imaged every 10 seconds for 2 hour intervals. My cameras were placed in
various POV's and programmed to fire autonomously. In much of this research, I was not present during time of some
exposures. However, this sequence of frames taken from the gate of AREA 51 are manually taken. I stopped immediately
upon receiving command to leave the area! (Note: When you receive a telepathic message, comply, then leave quickly!)
Object 2, vectoring at a different angle, however; registered in all frames imaged in this sequence. Object also demonstrated
a slithering forwards flight trajectory, headed in our (crew) POV.
Sample showing 2 luminous objects vectoring in flight above my head, at POV Gate location, AREA 51. Both objects shown
demonstrated the slithering forwards flight characteristics of these objects. I imaged this object on another occasion, however
taking 500 frames in the sequence. I was not alone, that night; Riley Martin and Eron McCauley were with me, on this expedition.
CMT's: My Big Redneck Vacation featuring Wilbur Allen, Riley Martin and Eron McCauley (TBA)
Riley Martin first sighted the UFO in our van headed to AREA 51. I filmed most of the trip, as Riley watched a luminous anomaly in
route to the site (AREA 51). Along with Riley and Eron, was Italian fashion photographer and UFO researcher Gianni Lo Giudice. He
took pictures in AREA 51 and the staging area where the film crews met at the end of the filming. Gianni's images are from a second
person POV and taken at the same time and location as my samples. They are a 100% match and confirming data to this research.
Insieme a Riley e Eron, moda italiana fotografo e ricercatore UFO Gianni Lo Giudice. Ha preso le foto in
AREA 51 e l'area di passaggio dove le troupe cinematografiche incontrati alla fine delle riprese. Gianni immagini sono di una seconda persona
POV e presa allo stesso tempo e luogo, come i miei campioni. Si tratta di una corrispondenza del 100% e confermare i dati di questa ricerca.
Gianni Lo Giudice
the same video with AVIID Boris FX BCC NR and Timewarp App location (HD Video) 2013*
Additional samples taken in AREA 51 shows the luminous object manifest into a stream of images, from out of nowhere! This
is a composite frame of 14 samples in this sequence. For this to happen, indicates this object moved at a constant and controlled
velocity. This clearly illustrated the ability of these object to enter into our airspace freely and undetected. We do not have the
technology to detect wormhole events, though NASA is familiar with these events, based on information provided by my
associate Dr. Edgar Mitchell (Apollo 14) on "Alien Wormhole Technology"
Enhanced sample shows this object deviated from its flight trajectory in a controlled manner.It deviated from its
trajectory in frame 8, and I cannot account for why it did so? VIdeo from frames to be uploaded shortly*. Update:
A closer look at this sequence shows a second object emerged from the same area as the first, however in a
different flight vector (direction)
Gianni's samples are 100% consistent with samples I obtained during this expedition. Though a slight difference
in technology, his image samples nevertheless show exactly what I imaged during this event. Note the streaks
and the red/white pulsing anomaly beneath them. All is consistent with samples taken at this time. Though this
shows samples in 1 frame which I obtained in several frames taken by my camera(s). However, his single frame
shed significant light on that which I imaged, for they are one and the same.
Play video: Thank you Sir for your excellent introduction... W
The Truth Denied with Roxy Lopez: Thank you Roxy!
8-03-2008, Baltimore Maryland Teardrop Anomaly, zig zagged at high velocity, out of the frames. My references to this flight
characteristic are signified by the samples taken at AREA 51, 10-14-2012. The first sample of alien flight technology, shows
the same flight dynamics as that imaged over AREA 51, however this is 5 years ago 2008
My hat's off to Gianni! Please note, this sample and the POV reference consistent with POV of D4. My samples are
10 mm Fisheye. Gianni's perspectives fill in the blanks to the images I took, and again are 100% consistent .
Il mio cappello è spento a Gianni! Si prega di notare, in questo esempio e il riferimento POV coerente con POV di D4. I miei campioni sono
10 millimetri Fisheye. Gianni prospettive di riempire gli spazi vuoti con le immagini che ho preso, e di nuovo al 100% coerenti.
I made video from the sequence of images taken from the staging area (crew meet location) in Rachel.
AREA 51 staging area, Rachel Nevada. Frame composite of 4 frames taken upon returning from AREA 51 gate.
On all imaged files shown, there is metadata impressions on all photographs. That means the images have the
physical conditions of the shoot, inclusive of camera used, shutter speed, aperture, and geometric specifics
(angular definition) of each imaged file. These are not CGI/faked imagery; however, actual photographic samples.
Video composite shows the objects flight characteristics are maintained even at low altitudes.
The Whole Agenda: Wilbur Allen
The object imaged is in a No-Fly Zone, AREA 51 Nevada. The object(s) followed us back to base camp. The flight
trajectory of this sample indicates it is "slithering"/zig-zagging in a forwards trajectory. Sharks swim in this manner
as do al predatory aggressors in the wild.
UFO AREA 51 Crew Staging area Rachel, Nevada. In the air a slithering UFO. These are the first recorded (camera)
samples of this anomaly during this AREA 51 Expedition.
UFO consistent with later samples showing this luminous object slithering through space over AREA 51. The object up
close resembles a series of spheres connected. This is consistent with the images taken from the gate POV of Area 51
Frame 2 of UFO encountered at Staging area during AREA 51 Expedition. Object based on these samples,
maintained flight characteristics (slithering)through the sky.
Frame 2 anomaly enlarged and we see the object is now curved, which is consistent with the slithering flight
characteristics imaged on this evening and location, AREA 51.
Frame 3 of UFO Encountered during AREA 51 Expedition. Ironically, from this point forwards, I felt "creeped" out!
Composite frames of UFO Anomaly which followed us back to camp ground
Composite of frames taken from staging area Area 51. Additional frames indicate that this object became less luminous
vectoring away from the POV base camp in Rachel Nevada. The additional frames which come after these frames show
this object leaving the area at a moderate rate of velocity. These 2 objects followed me to my hotel, 100 miles away from
AREA 51. I have definite proof of wormhole technology in use over AREA 51 immediate airspace. To demonstrate these
claims I use composite frames, which the event frames, layered on top of each other. All composited frames are matched
and filmed in sequence. When layered we can see the flight trajectory of the objects sampled in these continuous frames.
UFO tracked in several frames imaged in 10 mm fisheye in Rachel Nevada (AREA 51). Based on samples, object
maintained a straight however, zig-zagging trajectory away from POV campgrounds.
Enhanced frames showing zig-zagging anomaly leaving POV staging area Rachel Nevada. This anomaly followed me
100 miles to my hotel where I imaged it exiting a distortion in space, though to be a wormhole.
Frames connected, these two composites represent the flight trajectory of an anomaly in Restricted AirSpace AREA 51
Autonomous fire: 1 frame every 10 seconds. D4 Nikon, 100000 ISO
Cloud Anomaly, staging grounds, Rachel Nevada. I cannot explain this cloud mass? I created video from the frames
to show the event, which to some, is insignificant? However; the cloud mass manifests in the sky and not on the
ground? If this was attributed to ground traffic, then the cloud mass would originate from ground level, not the sky?
AREA 51 UFO sequence! Click on image to access this extraordinary file.
The far left of screen is a luminous white streak. This streak is an unknown anomaly, which could be meteor or UFO related.
Apollo Missions UFO's
Apollo 7 Green Fireball UFO 1968
This sample shows without doubt, the exact anomaly encountered at the US Capitol Building July 16, 2002, however in Space as
imaged by Apollo 7, in Earths orbit. This sample indicates that NASA had knowledge of this anomaly in 1968* The anomaly is a 100%
match to that which was captured at the US Capitol Building July 16, 2002 using Nikon HD Film/Digital technology.
Buzz Aldrin Apollo 11: Click on sample.
Imaged outside the Command Module by Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin during Apollo 11 in 1969
US Capitol/Apollo 11 Green UFO Comparative Analysis (2002/1969). This comparative analysis implies
100% consistency with that which I imaged at the US Capitol Building on July 16, 2002. Interestingly,
the Apollo 11 sample, which is 16 mm motion picture film, is also 100% consistent with the US Capitol
UFO anomalies, imaged too HD 35 mm film, and scanned to digital via direct film scan technology. The
forensic comparative analysis, based on physical examination of "like" image samples submitted from
various locations around the World and in Outer Space by NASA JPL Apollo Moon Program Files. We Are
*UFO anomalies imaged 4-08/13/14/15/16/17-2012 @ 1/8000th of a second*
Dr. Edgar Mitchell and Will Allen 11:00-12:30 PM Today*
Dr. Edgar Mitchell (Moon Landing Apollo 14) Apollo 14 Launch and Lunar Landing
Apollo 14 liftoff and landing, ground mission footage lunar surface: Click on Image above*
For those that were there, you were all treated! How kind of Edgar to answer all your questions. Thank you Dr. Edgar Mitchell
for your time and friendship. Thank you most of all for being there.. W
My associate Dr. Edgar Mitchell and I lectured on abstract realities which
I have sectioned off, below. To doubt the validity of this UFO Forensic research sample, is to doubt
the credibility of those astronauts represented in my research. Here's too those that said to me that
NOBODY would confirm my data! Nobody would be relegated to those small minds unable to process the
Unknown. Small minds have big mouths, and a big mouth says Nothing! I say that the samples are
forensically consistent with the images taken onto film July 16, 2002 at the US Capitol Building. To further
the validity of the imaged samples, I defer to NUFORC July 20, 2002 @ the US Capitol Building
Highlights of our lecture included discussion of Alien Wormhole Technology:
Alien Plasma based spacecraft technology:
My lecture is most conclusive, and based on forensic physical evidence:
Buzz Aldrin & Neil Armstrong photographed Green anomalies outside the Command Module
during Apollo 11. After assembling the facts, one can safely conclude my samples are far from
"Lens Flares", as believed by the unenlightened.
An interview with a witness to the 1952 UFO Flyby at the US Capitol* 2012. His recorded statements confirmed
my forensic presentation, which has not been widely accepted by doubters incapable of accepting the truth.
2012 On my way home from a New Years Party at Lincoln on Thomas Circle, I noticed 2 luminous orange objects
flying against the wind* Supportive physical evidence based on HD samples in a comparative analysis* I also question
the negative comments on my Amazon page in regard to this work and "lack of physical evidence" as insinuated by those
who's sole purpose is to hold you in the lie that you live.* The fact of the matter, based on the physical samples:
We are Not Alone. You may continue to regard this work as bogus; your stupidity will be your downfall.
Dr. UFO's Great UFO/ET PARA/META Congress
Conference 2012 and Ted Phillips-Alan Hynek associate
Note the Orange UFO Objects in Ted's presentation, match the anomalies encountered in Mount Vernon New York by
Melvin Harris July 4, 2008, and in Baltimore Maryland, August 3, 2008
2 luminous orange anomalies imaged using 10 mm Fisheye @ 12,800 ISO. Object flew against the wind slowly and were
100% silent* (Continued) with physical samples.
The 4th of July @ The Washington Monument
Electrical Storm Cloaked UFO anomalies (HD close proximity samples)
The return of the cloaked and vectoring anomalies.
Transformer UFO Updated HD Video
This site is active*. The links are supportive data, some of which may require membership (Facebook HD Video)
and UFOwga You-Tube HD channel
© WG Allen VAu000621288
Will Allen UFO
*UFO Color Texture Bitmaps for Motion Pictures Special Effects and 3D Game Development
UFO Color Technology for 3D: Extraterrestrial Color Texture Bitmaps ETCTBmp
I Cannot give you the meaning too that which is unknown. I can however show (Forensics), facts
relevant to the events I experienced in the creation of this work.
Thank you: Stephen W. Hawking
Thank you: Dr. Edgar Mitchell
“Whoever undertakes to set himself up as a judge of Truth and Knowledge is shipwrecked by the laughter of the gods.”
Lee Speigel: Huffington Post
Thank you George Noory & AM Coast to Coast
Wilbur Allen: AM Coast to Coast April 10, 2012
AM Coast to Coast April 10, 2012
Will Allen: Fox 5 News
Baltic Ocean anomaly slid to rest, upon entering the water with some velocity
The samples in this research study are extraordinary forensic samples, based on comparative analysis
Fox News Radio/Alan Colmes: UFO expert Wilbur Allen Fox News Radio © Fox News 2010
Fox News Radio: http://www.alan.com/2010/07/09/on-fridays-radio-show-130/ © Fox News 2010
I have been experiencing some rather extraordinary events and objects* http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=10150189404444195
First I can safely say that I am being monitored by unknown advanced technology. I am documenting objects
which are repeating anomalies of the past. The US Capitol UFOs from 1952, 2002, The Orange UFO and Teardrop
Mothership from Baltimore 2008 (Orange Objects) imaged again, in 2011.
However the extreme events show a cloaked disc saucer and translucent Orange anomaly which force a stationary mounted
camera too move from a locked position:
***UFO's at the Washington Monument July 4, 2011***
NASA and private image samples*, Florida October 2010* The Florida samples are the icing on the cake.
On July 4 & 16, 2002, I documented airborne anomalies in Restricted Airspace P-53 (P-51 referenced in this sample*).
I am clueless too the origins or agenda's of these objects; however, I can show you physical samples supportive of
reports posted by secondary witnesses (NUFORC) web reports database. Reports are relative too: Time, Date, and
Location of events.
I am not here to tell you stories, I simply show the facts. Regardless if you acknowledge my data, the facts remain
there are some that feel this level of information dangerous too society. The facts of the matter are left to your
interpretations. However; I have attempted to be as thorough as possible in assembling a forensic map and perspectives
of these anomalies. The facts of the matter are presented in this comparative analysis. There are many samples of
UFO and USO anomalies, on HD Film and HD 1080 I Digital* (The Worlds first HD Digital UFO samples in close
proximity) 8-03-2008 Baltimore Maryland (NUFORC/NASA authenticated*)
*NUFORC NASA samples are image and written reports based on location and time of physical samples, NASA
Shuttle Missions files image data* 1991
4-02-2011 UFO Upper Marlboro Maryland, outside of Andrews AFB*. Anomaly is similar too that which was imaged
July 4, 2010*
4-06-2011 in the air above my home, I imaged a luminous Green anomaly (during daylight hours) along with
the "White Winged Anomalies like those imaged with models during a fashion shoot* (Micro/Macro UFO Anomaly HD). An
Orange anomaly consistent with August 3, 2008 in Baltimore, Maryland.
4-07-2011 I imaged a pair of luminous spheres, exactly as those which buzzed the US Capitol Dome in 1952,
5-22-2011 Luminous Blue Sphere Anomaly @ 1/8000th of a second in daylight
5-30-2011 and earlier 5-22-2011 UFO HD image samples updated
June started off with a Bang! From June 1 -3, each day, has provided an extraordinary sample! Chapters updated
will have update dates indicated upon open.
Buzz Aldrin reports of Green UFOs outside of Apollo 11 Spacecraft
This physical confirmation by the crew of Apollo 11 of the validity and authenticity of my physical documentation
July 16, 2002 at the US Capitol Building P-53 Restricted Airspace
HD RGB Analysis of Green Sphere UFO Anomaly and the After Effects of Alien Contact
HD VIdeo Analysis
First Contact TV
UFO Forensic Files I-Pad e-Book(s)
UFO Forensic Files on Demand:
UFO Forensic Files: HD Film (35 mm @ 64 Bit HD)/HD Digital @ 1080 P (64 Bit sample)
Lower US Senate Park, The US Capitol Building: July 16, 2002 @ 01:30 AM
The basis of my research are film samples captured in 2002, however; I am now HD Digital and the samples
are captured in multiple sequential frames*
UFO at the US Capitol Building 2012* You must see this footage*
11-12-2010 UFO Samples New Jersey* Updated visual files*, comparative analysis of DC/NJ UFO Anomalies
11-28-2010 UFO Samples: Washington DC*
The many faces of ET: http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=7623&id=100002005931508
BOCA RATON, FL--Residents in a Boca Raton neighborhood say they looked up Monday night around 9 pm and saw a mysterious green light.
Ryan Helfrich says, "this thing was going crazy zig zagging, like shot across the sky. That was unbelievable! Like nothing I've ever seen before."
Wilbur Allen (UFOdc.com) You-Tube:http://www.youtube.com/user/UFOwga
How interesting some find this an artifact of green laser, however green laser did not hit the market commercially until
US Capitol/Apollo 11 UFO Comparative analysis HD.
This sample clearly indicates full knowledge of this anomaly by NASA in 1969
1991 NASA JPL image sample of 2 luminous green anomalies in space during satellite deployment
I received this NASA JPL image sample taken in Space in 1991, showing a formation of 2 Green UFO Anomalies
In a comparative analysis with reference samples from the US Capitol Building, this Shuttle Bay anomaly is a match
too the Ground based anomalies in Taft Park. There are differences in the airborne anomalies and those that are
on the ground. Though visually the same on the surface, they had different characteristics upon comparative
analysis of both air and ground based objects. However; in the analysis of the reference files, we find Red & Blue
are components of this green anomaly.
Taken in Florida October 2010 by Linzee Mundtt. THis sample is a 100% match too the objects from
the US Capitol Building July 16, 2002
Florida 2010 (Digital sample) taken by Ronnie Barnes
Daylight sample 4-07-2011 Washington DC
August 24, 2011,
Comparative analysis of several samples taken over the course of years 2002-2010. The 2002 film samples
are reference files, because this sample is the Highest Resolution and best possible sampling of this anomaly.
Reference sample 4 spheres in formation @ the US Capitol Building. Next to it is a digital sample taken in Peru
2007, then the Florida samples taken by 2 different photographers during an encounter in Florida October
2010. The samples show that these objects are the same technology.They are also the same technology
imaged by Betty & Barney Hill in the 1970s. However first written documentation was reported by RAF
pilots over Germany in 1942.
"CLOSE ENCOUNTERS @ THE US CAPITOL"
© VAu000621288 WG Allen 2004/2009
Library of Congress, US Capitol Division Copyright Office
This work cannot be used, in any way, without written permission.*
Wilbur Allen NGM Gallery 2
QuickExplore: Wilbur Allen http://www.nationalgeographicstock.com/ngsimages/welcome.jsf
US Capitol UFO Anomalies July 16, 2002
Forensic documentation of a "Close Encounter of the 1st through 4th Kind"
Lower US Senate Park/Peru 2007/ Oklahoma-Washington DC 2010 samples
The After Effects of an Alien Encounter
Forensic documentation of a "Close Encounter of the 1st through 4th Kind"
Lower US Senate Park/Peru 2007/ Oklahoma-Washington DC 2010 samples
Note the Green & red streaks at the rear of the park, the USO and UFOs in motion. These could not possibly be
due too refraction or distortion due to ground based lights. This is further documentation of the UFO landings at
the US Capitol Building July 16, 2002 (July 16, 1952*)
The US Capitol Reflection Pool July 16, 2002 (Wilbur Allen/Stanton Friedman/Richard Dolan)
The US Capitol HD samples/Micro anomalies Infrared/HD/Stanton Friedman/Peter Robbins/Richard Dolan
Micro UFO Anomalies Barney and Betty Hill: The Betty Hill samples*1961/Cydonia Mars HD
On November 11, 2002 I encountered Micro UFOs. I believe they were
discharged from the anomaly I encountered in Lower Senate Park.
July 4 & 26 2002/Apollo 16 Moon Anomalies match
Washington Monument scan showing flight trajectory of aircraft on takeoff vector from Reagan National Airport,
Washington DC 11-30-2012. 85 mm F 1.8 Perspective using 100 ISO and 30 second exposure.
July 4, 2010 UFO Event @ The Washington Monument is the second imaged by me at this location*
July 4, 2011 UFO Event @ The Washington Monument is the third imaged by me at this Location*
July 4, 2011 UFO Event @ The Washington Monument There were 2 objects in the air*, Cloaked. One
July 4, 2012 @ The Washington Monument * (HD Video).My Fourth Encounter at this location
frame with 2 luminous spheres imaged before the start of the show* (Inside)
Comparative Analysis July 4, 2002 @ The Washington Monument
July 4, 2010 Full Analysis*
http://www.facebook.com/UFOdc?v=app_2392950137#!/video/video.php?v=404645309194 Video of 7-04-2010 UFO*
UFO's @ The Washington Monument, July 4, 2010. 1140 frames were taken from a stationary platform at the base of the Monument.
In 1 frame were 2 luminous anomalies. They appear in this single frame, at the same altitude but different locations in the sky.
Samples featured on MSNBC (NBC) below*
NBC News:Wilbur Allen© NBC News 2010 (Click image to Enter MSNBC)
Storm Event 2 UFOs
Lightening Storm UFO Anomaly
Lightening Storm UFO Anomaly 3(6-22-2012)
June 20, 2010: During a thunder storm, a single luminous anomaly exited an electrically charged cloud, Video:*
Dr. Alfred Webre
UFO imaged @ 1/8000th of a second, in a sequence of images taken 5-28-2011.
Enhanced and additional image samples inside* this POLITICO Chapter
Printed Version* Hyper Velocity (1/8000th of a second) UFO's
Politico: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0710/39383.html © Politico 2010
Micro/Macro UFO Anomaly HD
A most spectacular micro/macro UFO anomaly imaged 6-10-2010 and 7-01-2010 in Washington DC (HD forensic samples)
Super Model Rissa Richards in white dress*
Multiple documentation of this luminous white winged anomaly, sampled @ 1/8000th of a second*
Updated samples from New Jersey which match imaged anomalies from this session
All images © WG Allen VAu000621288 Registered Intellectual Properties
Media Composer 6.5
July 20, 2010: I imaged a slow moving UFO pulse through the sky, then fire an energy beam which extended from it"
July 20, 2010 HD composite of 10 frames taken in sequence. In the sample are red and blue spheres which moved in tandem. There was also
another anomaly, considered Non Corporeal, being pursued by a Red anomaly as the luminous object discharges a plasma beam.
Video created from imaged samples
Note the echoes (red and blue) all match. The anomalies flew in tandem*
July 20, 2010 UFO Anomaly
10 frame composite of UFO Anomaly imaged July 20, 2010 (Analysis: Dr. Bruce Maccabee)
Jaime Maussan and Alfred Webre:
Alfred Lambremont Webre
Mount Vernon, New York (Melvin Harris) July 4, 2008 and Baltimore, Maryland (Wilbur Allen) August 3, 2008. Both samples match.
Orange Vectoring Anomaly: http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=122114149194
Addition Digital sample obtained 2010. MUFON
Additional imaged sample 4-07-2011 during Daylight hours
HD 1080 i UFO Files
The Worlds First HD 1080 i UFO samples: Baltimore Maryland. This extraordinary sample shows
the Mothership imaged at high warp* over the skies of Baltimore 08-03-08
1952-2010 US Capitol UFO's HD Analysis
HD 1080 Samples obtained in 2010 show these 1952 anomalies have not gone away. I am imaging the same
anomalies except now they are at hypervelocity. Imaged @ 1/8000th of a second and still blurs..
UFO Extraction Colors: Extraterrestrial Color Texture Bitmaps (RMOS) Applied to 3D UFO creation in HD environment
The byproducts of HD UFO samples: Extraterrestrial Color Texture Bitmap materials applicable too 2.5-3D Applications
UFO Event Timeline: NUFORC
Video Analysis UFOwga
UFO Forensic Files on Amazon.com
UFO Forensic Files DVD on Amazon.com
Chapter 1: Wilbur Allen's ET/UFO Close Encounters (First Contact)
Peter Woronoff: Alien Abduction Therapy on Amazon.com (Rest in Peace Dear friend)
(Book cover designed by UFOdc.com)
Thank you Stephen Hawking
Thank you: Dr. Edgar Mitchell
"Video Editor for Mac"?
My Big Redneck Vacation UFOdc.com
Ben's Chili Bowl
Blu-ray Video Available, contact me.
Though it may be impossible to reach me on Facebook, here is my Facebook Link.
All images © WG Allen VAu000621288 Registered Intellectual Properties
© WG Allen 2004/2008/2009/2010