Wilbur Allen and John B. Wells on Imaginative Worlds

The Search for ET Portals and Bases: AREA 51/Sedona/Washington DC (National Geographic)

My Big Redneck Vacation UFOdc.com

It is my opinion that this abandoned structure is an ET Base, and that any and all abandoned structures can indeed

be bases for anomalous objects such as spheres which can materialize . Though the basis of this example is built upon

still frame imagery taken in rapid continuous succession, my samples are now filmed 60 FPS in motion picture.

The begriming of the shoot, and an indicator of things too come? There are 2 airborne anomalies with attributes like "Orbs".

However; they are only imaged in this session in this 1 image* 1.5 hours later, we ended up @ the abandoned church* (Below)

Apparently, this event started much earlier than concluded.*

4-25-2016 UFO Sphere Triangular Formation SM SDM Analysis

I reopened this file only to discover an additional image taken moments earlier, than what I thought to be the first image manifestation of

this object. IN this sample frame left, top of image, is an unknown luminous light source in the sky. It only appears in this image (sky).

Luminous light source in the sky, and 1 of 2 anomaly objects in this sample

Object 2, in sample one, may be my primary anomaly subject*. This anomaly appears only one time in this position*

Anomaly 2 in frame 1 of anomalous manifestation

6-10-2010. This was originally a Fashion shoot for Urban Haute Couture

This event is most spectacular: beneath Ravyn (supermodel in pink dress), is a luminous anomaly extending from the wall of the church*

Frame 1

Frame 1 Anomaly: Upon examination, it is noticed that this object has numerous energy protrusions*, and appears to be protruding

from the brick on the wall. A closer look at this object, shows a energy anomaly with several energy tentacles.

Frame 1 Anomaly: This anomaly morphed into a larger object in less than 2.5 seconds. Captured in 5 frames of continuous action*

THe anomaly is now beneath Rissa Richards, and Adriana B models in white dresses (center) and upper left. The anomaly seems to

pass between solid structures, manifesting on the metal rim of the stairs. However, I should mention and show a sample taken 1.5 hours

earlier on 12th and U Street. * Below

The anomaly is now spherical from a triangular configuration in the initial manifestation sample. The physical attributes morphed

from a small object too that which is substantially larger. In some cases morphing is a constant factor in some UFO anomalies*

Looking at the gradient qualities generated in analysis, we are able to conclude certain attributes specific too anomalies within

energy fields (propulsion field required to generate liftoff)

Inverted analysis shows essentially the same energy barrier around this anomaly in this limited state. It changes again in the next

frame, taken in high speed strobe rear curtain technology (D700 Nikon @ H1/20000 ISO)

Frame 3: The anomaly is now larger and elevated higher "in" the wall* The anomaly is between the wall and open space in front of

the wall.

A close analysis shows that this object projected a beam of light on the elbow of model Rissa Richards (white dress). The anomaly is

also in a horizontal configuration which resembles Saturn.

It is a protrusion from within the wall of this abandoned church in NW DC. This sequence represents 2.5 seconds of action in HD Strobe

mode.

Frame 4, and the object takes another shape and configuration, from a horizontal perspective too vertical?

Much larger than its original size and configuration, the anomaly flies out the image.. However 20 days later and moving

at hypersonic velocity and imaged @ 1/8000 second, this object is still essentially a blur. If not for the fact this is a multiple

frame capture, the basis of my assertions would easily be dismissed or debunked. However; they are not and cannot be

debunked because of the number of physical representations obtained in the high speed sampling.

Imaged 7-01-2010 1/8000 second. This however is not the only abstract anomaly I imaged in this sequence.*

Though a blur, I an forced by example to conclude this object to be the same as that which I imaged @ the abandoned church

with the models. I cannot tell you what I imaged at this extraordinary speed (1/8000th second).

Extreme close-up of airborne anomaly 5-28-2011

A repeat capture of this unknown White Oblong Winged UFO Anomaly 5-28-2011* Recaptured Imaged @ 1/8000th of a second

in a series of images. It appears clearly in this sample of images *

Same anomaly

Imaged consistently during this event, is this single blue orb anomaly

This anomaly is consistent with the objects imaged 6-10-2010* in

Lawrenceville  NJ 11-12-2010 

I cannot tell you what this object is, however imaged @ 1/8000th of a second, it is essentially still a blur!

Enhanced sample of airborne anomaly

Enhanced HD sample showing a very abstract airborne multicolored object

Enhancing the sample, using dropdown filtration menu profiles: Solarization applied to image sample. The application generally

mutes conventional swatch colors too Black or gradient of Black*; however, this did not happen with the colors on this sample?

8-27-2010 @ 2:15 PM, this sample taken @ 1/8000th of a second, showing airborne anomalies, which were not seen*

There are several anomalies in this sample which are most spectacular! The first and obvious is the dual anomaly, which upon

close analysis looks exactly like 7-01-2010 (Physical characteristics match 100%, 2 white disproportional protrusions and a black

core*

Consider this sample is a blur, however the exposure levels indicate it should not be blurred? It is. Taken 1/8000th of a second

@ F-32. Camera sensitivity 400 ISO. I found L2 limited in the areas away from the Sun. HOwever if you are looking at the Sun

specifically, then it is advised to limit your camera too a very low setting, minimizing damage to the CCD of the camera.

However for the area around the sun, and not the sun specifically, then I would go with 400 ISO as I did in this sample.

Enhanced sample showing additional anomalies which are concealed in the Suns intensity

firing conditions.

4-13-2012 UFO Anomaly, this is not an insect with a luminous protrusion. Consistent with the anomaly imaged which

resembles a fly, however without visible extremities. 1/8000th of a second @ F-22

This is not an insect, and the protrusion is energy based* 4-13-2012

4-16-2012 Note the anomaly single energy protrusion is consistent with the anomaly from 4-13-2012 (above)

4-16-2012 Anomaly enhanced

5-21-2010: Anomaly, mistaken for a fly, has clipped wings? There are no wings on the opposite side of this object*

The image is taken from street level, aiming upwards towards the sky. The perspective would be the bottom of the fly

in flight*.

9-01-2011, Also taken at 1/8000th of a second and aimed directly upwards

Anomaly enhanced (Note the dorsal configuration on this object and the object below.

4-08-2012 airborne anomaly imaged at 1/8000th of a second at F-22.

Sample indicates dorsal's are propulsion byproducts of this object.

Comparative analysis of anomaly and known Housefly configurations

Possible Wasp, however, why is its main frame glowing?

4-15-2012 Anomaly

http://www.nationalgeographicstock.com/ngsimages/welcome.jsf

Continue to Next Chapter