Updated 2-05-2013 Logan Circle UFO Spheres in formation.
Fox News 31 Denver UFO (Below)
Thank you Erika Lovley*: Politico July 6, 2010
Photograph: John Shinkle/ Politico
Thank you Politico, for being open minded and fair to the facts. The article written by Erika is factual and non biased. This is not a humorous message
and deals with documented activity in and around Restricted Airspace in Washington DC.
Will Allen, George Knapp, Karin Marcatillio, and Richard Dolan at the X Conference 2010 National Press Club
My Big Redneck Vacation UFOdc.com
Will Allen UFO Lecture 2011 in NJ, made front page news, in that area.
Human Magnetic Fields
In my research, I used advanced technology in the creation of this work. One of the abilities of the technology is high shutter
speeds: 1/8000th of a second. If I close the aperture of my lens, all the way down (lens is set to smallest irs opening*)and set
the shutter speed to 1/8000 th of a second and ain at the Sun, chances are (70%) that if I fire multiple images in High Speed
mode, I will get airborne luminous anomalies. I will demonstrate with a sample taken 08-30-2010.
08-30-2010 1/8000th of a second image sample taken of the Sun
Enhanced hypervelocity samples. There are 2 luminous anomalies (UFOs) airborne*. In many of my Sun samples, there are
clusters of luminous objects
Solarization applied to these objects generally shows the muted energy gradients of these anomalies. Usually, as in this sample,
the anomaly's simply change colors. However this change is the residual energy signature generated by the luminosity of the UFOs.
2 luminous Blue Spheres at Hypervelocity
Enhanced sample of Blue formation
(The samples shows airborne anomalies, however; I am speculating (conjecture) as to the origins
of the objects imaged @ 1/8000th second*)
Denver UFO 11-08-2012 reported by FOX News Denver
Watch this report, then read this research!
These are the same object (Below) however; here the object is cloaked and is exactly like that imaged in
Space by NASA Apollo astronauts.
UFO imaged @ 1/8000th of a second, in a sequence of images taken 5-10-2-11 at a White House Town Meeting,
the All Souls Church, 16th and Columbia Road NW, DC.
Enhanced sample of UFO anomaly is a blur, however imaged @ 1/8000th of a second F-22 (Maximum depth of Field). Additional
analysis: http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=10150177223454195. This sample also from 5-10-2011, shows an
anomaly in forwards flight, however consistent with another sample taken in New Jersey 2010:
UFOdc.com: My Big Redneck Vacation on CMT
In this frame taken randomly in the desert outside of AREA 51, is a blurred anomaly* The shutter speed generally
is not known for blurring
Unknown object imaged in single frame outside of AREA 51 during daylight hours
Single frame of spherical cloaked anomaly imaged at 1/8000th of a second 8-23-2011. The anomaly is perfectly round and imaged
only in one frame* of 21 taken during this session
Frame 8112 in series of 1000 images taken 5-22-2011. The sample clearly shows several luminous anomalies moving at high velocity
5-22-2011 Luminous Blue Sphere Anomaly with smaller luminous objects in tow@ 1/8000th of a second in daylight*
5-30-2011 and a solid peach seed shaped UFO*
5-30-2011 Peach seed shaped metallic UFO anomaly. Note the anomaly imaged in the 12-2012 Denver News footage and the
anomaly imaged in DC at 1/8000th of a second.
Denver News 12-2012 with a story about unseen objects (because the move faster than we can see) in the air of Denver Colorado,
my old home town. I was raised in part, in Denver, Colorado on Lowery AFB.
Unknown airborne anomaly 6-02-2011. Imaged at 1/8000th of a second, and captured in 2 back to back HD digital images*
Frame 2 of luminous anomaly*
Logan Circle UFO Vectoring anomalies were discharged from a cloud..1-25-2013 Click on image to see sequence
Enhanced sample showing objects discharged and vectoring from cloud over Logan Circle
4-15-2012 sequence of images taken @ 1/8000th of a second from stationary platform. Analysis: Dr. Bruce Maccabee:
"I looked at your pictures. Don't know what would make slanted images like those." BM
Using a large format HD digital camera, I'm capturing abstract anomalies @ 1/8000th of a second. Today's date
is 4-25-2012, and this is the second time I've captured this vertical UFO anomaly.
Russian video showing this very same anomaly
4-25-2012 Vertical vector anomaly imaged @ 1/8000th of a second frame 1 of 3
4-25-2012 Vertical vector anomaly enhanced frame 1. There should be no streaks @ 1/8000th of a second.
Frame 2 of vectoring anomaly and spheres.
Frame 2 enhanced, and again, there should be no streaks in the image sample at this extreme shutter speed (1/8000th of a sec)
The anomaly is consistent with an event imaged 4-15-2012 under the same relative filming conditions.
4-20-2012 relative filming conditions* Frame 1
4-20-2012 relative filming conditions* Frame 2. This object moved fast through the clouds and is imaged as a blur under extreme
4-13-2012 UFO Anomaly, this is not an insect with a luminous protrusion. Consistent with the anomaly imaged which
resembles a fly, however without visible extremities. 1/8000th of a second @ F-22
This is not an insect, and the protrusion is energy based* 4-13-2012
4-16-2012 Note the anomaly single energy protrusion is consistent with the anomaly from 4-13-2012 (above)
4-16-2012 Anomaly enhanced
6-02-2012 anomaly in single frame of video. Imaged 24frames per second @ 1/8000 th of a second
Enhanced sample of anomaly does not adhere to insect or lens flare characteristics.
5-21-2010: Anomaly, mistaken for a fly, has clipped wings? There are no wings on the opposite side of this object*
The image is taken from street level, aiming upwards towards the sky. The perspective would be the bottom of the fly
9-01-2011, Also taken at 1/8000th of a second and aimed directly upwards
Anomaly enhanced (Note the dorsal configuration on this object and the object below.
4-08-2012 airborne anomaly imaged at 1/8000th of a second at F-22.
Sample indicates dorsal's are propulsion byproducts of this object.
Comparative analysis of anomaly and known Housefly configurations
Possible Wasp, however, why is its main frame glowing?
UFO Flyby 5-06-2012 Washington DC (Frame Analysis) I'm constantly defending my work from ridiculous comments and statements
made by those individuals that call themselves the experts? This sample and my sample from Lower US Senate Park are considered
Non-UFO by Peter Davenport on AM Coast to Coast. Peter failed to see that these 2 objects are not connected and if these were
conventional aircraft, they would have conventional running lights as all aircraft do. How then do 2 objects become a conventional
aircraft when one object leads the other as they converge into the image frames. The work is based on a frame by frame analysis.
Frame analysis http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UhQpSv-c41A Please play in 1080 mode
5-06-2012 UFO FLyby captured on HD Video in Washington DC. This is a composite frame made from several random frames in
this extraordinary video capture. I captured the very same event, again, however; this time I have them fly in and then fly out
of the POV, from my stationary D4 mounted on the roof of my home. The camera is programmed to fire a frame every second
for 5.5 hours. (60 frames a minute , 1 frame per second, for 5.5 hours). What I captured is most extraordinary! How ironic I
would capture similar events, however months apart from the same location.
UFO Flyby 02-01-2013 POV Logan Circle Washington DC.
The camera is programmed to fire a frame every second for 5.5 hours. (60 frames a minute , 1 frame per second,
for 5.5 hours). I am able to scan and capture for extended durations, imagery over a period of time. This Interval function
is a feature designed into the D4 Nikon. Continuous high definition scans, equated to HD motion picture format video, then
extracted from video, frame by frame, flawlessly. The technology is essential in the examination of airborne anomalies,
over extended periods of time. 6 hours of images can be translated into 7.5 minutes of HD streaming video.
UFO Slow motion analysis: Pass 1 of 2. Object passes through the frames again, quickly, in the direction in
which it entered.
New Jersey 5-01-09
Jackson, New Jersey 5-01-09
Anomaly silently streaking through the sky
Note Blue anomaly above the rail on the road? It is imaged in all the imaged frame (9) taken from this POV.
Investigated by MUFON Field Investigator: Michael Austin Melton
Titusville Orb Sighting
May 1, 2009
On the first day of May in 2009, Witness Karin Marcatillio reports she was traveling in a van with Ufologist and photo analysis expert
Will Allen on the night prior to the beginning of “The Great UFO and ET Conference, held in Bordentown, New Jersey, lasting from
May 2nd to the 3rd. They were preparing for the opening day of the conference, and were out in the van picking up a P.A. System
borrowed from a friend. As they approached a restaurant called “It’s Nutts,” along NJ route 29, they pulled into the parking lot and parked
the car. The witness, Karin, got out of the van and prompted Will Allen to take a series of photographs. She felt almost a compulsion to do so.
Will Allen took a series of photographs with Karin in the picture. After they departed from the parking lot, Will went to examine the
photographs, and was astonished to find a peculiar phenomenon in the photo – a triangular indigo blue, self-luminous orb floated to
the right of Karin, at a distance of approximately 75 feel away, across the roadway, and above the guard rail. In the series of photos,
the blue orb moves slightly upward and to the left a bit, toward the witness. Of interest is the fact that neither Will nor Karin reported
seeing anything before or while the photos were being taken.
At 10:35pm, the sky over Titusville was clear, with a near full moon, a temperature between 45 and
50 degrees Fahrenheit. The visibility was excellent, the wind calm.
Witness Karin Marcatillio reported that she is normally a light sleeper, and was not tired during the sighting, which lasted about 30 seconds
(about the time it took to take the photos). She reported feeling some sort of mental telepathy or precognition, or communication
that directed her to coax Will Allen into taking the photos. She reported that this sensation continued during the sighting.
After the sighting, she reported feeling a sense of elation and peacefulness. When she viewed the pictures and saw the blue orb,
she reported feeling excited and felt more spiritual. It is the witness’ opinion that the orb represents her spirit guide.
Karin reports that she is psychic, and does channeling. She believes she has one, and possibly more, spirit guides that
assist her in helping others as well as herself. From a psychological viewpoint, she appears to be a well-adjusted,
independent and fully functioning individual with a strong altruistic sense and a strong empathy for others.
Physical Examination of the Area where Sighting Took Place:
A complete and thorough examination was performed, and photographic control photos were taken of the area.
This investigator could find no light source, reflective or otherwise that might be the cause of the orb in the photos.
The background where the orb was examined to see if light might have leaked through the woods, as there is a street that
runs behind that part of Washington’s Crossing State Park. Exam revealed that the wood behind the place where the sighting
took place was thick enough that no light from the road could make it through the brush. Additionally, there are no road
reflectors, glass or refuse that might be causing the illumined orb.
This investigator plans on returning to the site to take electromagnetic readings, and infrared night photography.
Despite the fact that the phenomenon appears genuine, there are still many questions to be addressed, one of which
is whether this is a paranormal supernatural presence, or if it is alien in nature.
Michael Austin Melton MUFON Field Investigator
Titusville New Jersey is the location of this anomaly . I found that this object, objects I imaged in 2002, and
objects imaged on the Moon by the crew of Apollo 16, Commander Buzz Aldrin to have the same
spectral luminosity Video of sequence: Blue Anomaly
The anomaly was not 100% stationary, and changed shapes in each progressive image. Blue Anomaly 2
KLM Anomaly comparative analysis too: J-4 Pulse/Apollo 16 Blue Moon UFOs*
Karin Marcatillio's Dr. UFO and Paranormal Investigations
Mission Statement To Inspire and Empower Others with Knowledge;
creating a whole New Awareness of Being a Cosmic Human Being.
Company Vision: To be one of the World's Premier Organization's providing a
well-rounded education in the Paranormal, Spiritual and Metaphysical Realms.
Dr. Bruce Maccabee :Subject: "Near sun UFOs"
I saw your pix taken at 1/8000 sec and f/22 or more to cut the sun's exposure level on the film plane so that you can point directly at the sun.
Others have done essentially the same thing using typical exposure times and f stops or video cameras by standing under an
object that partially obstructs the view of the sky, such as the edge of a roof, in such a way that the sun is just "beyond" the edge and blocked
from direct view. In other words, the sun is not in the picture, but the sky immediately adjacent to the sun and extending away from the sun is in the picture.
Thus one photographs the skyglow that is adjacent to the sun, but not the sun itself. With this setup, first used more than 15 years ago, people
have photographed and videotaped numerous "objects" that are not normally seen when looking away from the sun. Most (if not all) of these
objects are insects or insect related (e.g., spider webs) or plant related (seeds, pollen). These things are small and not easy to see under ordinary viewing
conditions. But viewing close to the sun is not a "normal" condition.
Objects that are close to the direction to the sun (but not exactly in the sun's direction) provide bright reflections of the sun's light. These reflections do
not necessarily correlate with the shape of the object. Instead what one may see is a very bright "spot" near the sun (that moves with the air
motion or due to its own motion, i.e., flying). This bright reflection is a result of "forward gloss" of the surface of the object. Gloss is a tendency
of a material (object) to reflect strongly when illuminated from one direction and viewed from another direction. Forward gloss is the tendency of any
material to reflect strongly when the light hits it at a shallow angle (almost parallel to the object surface) and the reflection is observed also at a s
hallow angle that is approximately in the direction of the light source. Even black velvet has a forward gloss that makes a rather bright reflection
when the velvet is illuminated by light that hits at a grazing incidence and the reflection is observed by looking at the surface almost in the
direction of the light source.
Your "setup" is optimum for observing small things in the atmosphere that can only be seen by the grazing light of the sun. Tiny objects will appear
as very bright spots depending upon their own reflectivity, size and shape. Generally speaking the atmosphere has numerous small objects that
are drifting (plant seeds, etc.) or traveling (insects of various types) that can be easily seen "near" the sun but can't easily be seen away from the direction to the
sun. Even distant birds, when viewed "close" to the sun, may appear as bright spots (forward gloss from feathers). Hence one must be careful about
labeling objects photographed or videotaped under these viewing conditions (within a few degrees of the sun's direction) as "ufos."
I should point out that these small objects are also generally near the camera. IF one wants to determine whether or not they are near the camera, and hence small,
one can use a stereo camera setup with many inches to a foot or more between cameras. A distant object would therefore appear in both cameras with a small parallax
shift whereas a very nearby object would have a large parallax shift or perhaps it wouldn't even appear in both cameras. (Parallax: the shift in direction to a
distant object when viewed from two locations.)
Note: I found L2 (100 ISO) samples of the Sun in direct view references, at this low ISO, limited in contrast, however showing luminous clusters,
some of which are blurs at 1/8000th of a second.
9 frames taken from POV showed 100% stationary USO anomalies, however; Tidal forces caused all the boats to sway.
SW Waterfront 12-27-2008 Washington DC. The above report is 20 minutes after I took the USO sample
in SW . The initial Police report made during the time of this sample, was examined
by officials of DC Mental Health Department instead of Police Officials. However
20 minutes later and 3 miles from this POV : http://www.nuforc.org/webreports/067/S67943.html
The anomalies were un swayed by tidal forces, and modulated colors White, Blue and Red underwater. It is a physical impossibility
that this sample is a reflection of light sources from the surface (boats) or reflections of light sources from across the river, as
suggested by the officer that answered the report? I was told the the water depth and visibility would not support a submersible.
However, it would reflect light from across the river? I sampled an anomaly in vertical liftoff 8 minutes after this sample.
One frame out of 9 taken from POV showed a luminous anomaly in a vertical disposition. 12/27/08
USO anomaly was unaffected by tidal currents*? The boats moved along with the water flow, however the USO
maintained 100% stationary positioning. There are no red lights on the surface that cant attribute to this luminous red
glow, submerged in the Potomac River.
The boats moved along with the water flow, however the USO
maintained 100% stationary positioning. There are no red lights on the surface that cant attribute to this luminous red
glow, submerged in the Potomac River.* 20 minutes later:
Occurred : 12/27/2008 22:30 (Entered as : 122708 22:00)
Reported: 1/9/2009 6:55:42 PM 18:55
Location: Fort Washington, MD
February 9, 2009 Note the edge of the next image and positioning of rectangular luminous UFO anomaly
Amadou Kouyate: UFO Close Encounter Baltimore Maryland 2-09-09
The anomaly based on this sample, was above our heads for over 3 minutes. However; we neither saw nor heard a thing?
Because I used rear curtain technology and an advanced camera, there is the possibility that the flash illuminated what may have
been cloaked. The flash reflected off the anomaly during exposure, though unseen. Like a mirror, the light reflected back
off this invisible object. It remained constant (shape) throughout this event
Baltimore Maryland, is an exceptional UFO Hotspot* Enhanced sample of "cloaked" UFO anomaly, which I believe reflected the
flash output during these exposures. This object was not seen nor heard by either of us?
A possible repeat appearance of the Baltimore Anomaly imaged in 2010 in New Jersey and 2011 in Downtown DC
New Jersey November 2010, composite sample of luminous UFO
5/28/2011 Luminous UFO with characteristics similar to that imaged in Baltimore 2009*
Anomaly enhanced shows object to be similar too the Amadou Anomaly
6-30-2011 single frame of luminous anomalies imaged @ 1/8000th of a second*
These objects are as luminous as the Sun. In each sample when in the direct field of the Sun, these objects outshine
11-23-2010 UFO Samples: Washington DC* This sample taken @ 1/8000th of a second @ F-32 should have everything in focus,
However; it does not? This anomaly registered a wake as it passed by and is a blur. However; its inverted analysis showed its
shape is similar too the anomaly imaged in Baltimore with Amadou*
Note the anomaly cuts a wake in the sky as it passed, unseen during this series of exposures.
Up-close perspective of anomaly showed it has a gradient energy signature and an energy field around it. It is in shape, a
match too the anomaly imaged in Baltimore with Amadou* Being followed by an object leaves a rather unsettling feeling?
I am being followed by more than one object*
Continue to Next Chapter